ReadyasEver
Elementalist
- Dec 6, 2018
- 828
I don't think IQ tests are worthless. I also don't dispute their predictive value in the areas mentioned of education level, occupation level, income level, and job performance. My issue with them is the numbers they generate don't exist in a vacuum. They have societal consequences and those consequences have ramifications on various demographics that result in unwholesome outcomes both in the past and present. Especially now amongst people with learning difficulties, who through these tests then get pushed into 'special classes' they are far too intelligent for. Wind up bored out their skull and essentially give up, becoming the very thing they have been assigned as. Even if that pigeonholing has been arrived at erroneously due to them simply being deficient in certain areas. That is one of my main gripes. Plenty of geniuses have existed that demonstrates this issue, failures academically but revolutionaries nonetheless.
There are also dangers in these numbers and the value that may well be placed on them. So much so they had to be legislated against in the realm of employment in some countries. Ironically, the thing they are good at measuring success for. We don't need more discriminatory tools. It's bad enough being too old for a job, to overqualified for a job, without being told your IQ number means you can't be employed by us or we have to let you go. If people want to use IQ scores as a dick waving contests to get into Mensa fine, I don't care about that. But I do care about people being thrown on scrap heaps because of arbitrary tests that don't take into account the wide range and sorts of intelligence. IQ tests also do not take into account the barriers to education. I really detest labelling culture in general. I think we would be better served if IQ tests were renamed puzzle tests.
Here, here. They can be used to be predictive in some instances, but never ever as a decision making factor or to draw conclusions.