I agree it's a silly marketing strategy, fooling around trust. Did he understand the demand comes from a community audience that will eventually find out, instead of isolated persons ?
My cousin was one of the largest dealer in Geneva, still had baron providers from Lebanon and Eastern Europe above him.
Resellers don't necessarily know the details of what they're selling, they don't spend ressources at labs' testing. They're occupied by the transactions, usually a messy life and their own security. That can be part of the explanation. He might not have a clue he sends 30% sugar or 20% the next time, if it is.
I remember J was offering reshipment. It's good practice when the profit is large.
C didn't want to give up on bypassing his site without escrow, but he ended up revealing he'd sell on another DNM called White House Market, which offers escrow service and accepts Monero only (better than Bitcoin for anonymity). Haven't checked to make it function or if stable unlike EM, but maybe worth an investigation.
The running away with no compensation policy through his own website is just gross. A offers discounts if first shipment encounters a problem. Teach C business by forcing his hand through correct portal selection if abusive ?
You make a few errors here. First, C is not a reseller but synthesizes the drugs himself. Secondly, everybody purchasing knows that the purity is not a hundred percent; what I meant by ruining his reputation is that it would do so if he used something dangerous as a filler substance for no good reason at all or the purity was way lower. I think he knows what the product is purchased for: 1 product = suicide for one person; and I predict that the purity of his N will eventually lower, because 17 grams aren't really needed for one person. Thirdly, we have no idea whether or not the filler substance is sugar. I am not a chemist, so I just said it could be sugar; who knows what he uses; probably something that isn't toxic and does not react with the substances he laces it with.
But did you read this paragraph?
And have you read it yourself? Especially the part where it says "
usually apsychoactive compound
"? Why would he waste his Etizolam or whatever shit drug he also synthesizes as a filler substance?
I could only imagine him doing it if he thinks people use N as a recreational drug. But then, what should that be? Some weird opioid? There definitely weren't any stimulants or hallucinogenic drugs in there, or at least not in quantities I could detect in my own test—otherwise I wouldn't have fell asleep, right? I mean, let's suppose there were stimulants in there; then that would be really, really bad. But the benzos he sells are not new psychoactive substances (Etizolam, alprazolam) and the opioids wouldn't be counterproductive.
So the only way I see your hypothesis work is if he added unknown, new forms of stimulants to make it more fun recreationally: how likely is this hypothesis? I would rather apply Occam's razor and say that it's simply a filler substance. They don't test for filler substances AFAIK. Older test results had a purity of around seventy percent and showed no unknown substances—but they didn't specify the filler substance in those cases.
Another possibility could be that he intentionally added something to make you throw up or survive, so an emetic substance or stimulants, in the hope that you come back and make a second purchase. This is a possibility, I don't trust drug dealers from China one bit...but still—its not the most likely explanation imo.
