@MeltingHeart @Lethe @redbull @Stan @Secrets1 @Mr2005
The Kim Jong-un of this site deleted my suicide image&video thread despite 45% SS'ers want to see them. Well, you win!
It's pathetic to see people private message me requesting for the material don't even dare to "like" my posts that drew hostility from people who are zealous about keeping the site "tidy and clean".
What was I thinking, most SS'ers still adopt the mainstream values that I never fit into - they just have more life problems and heightened sensitivity and fragility compared to the general public.
This entire world, this SS community are full of hypocrites and political correctness.
A classical example of collective hypocrisy - people enjoy the fruits of Nazi doctors' medical research while condemning the cruel experiments they performed on concentration camp inmates that directly led to those medical breakthroughs. Nazi doctors made the link between asbestos and lung cancer, developed the first high-powered electron microscope, did trauma research with military applications, etc. You think the accurate data we have on human body limitations all come from lab rats and guinea pigs? Don't stand from a moral high ground and pretend you can't be further away from the Nazis or any other groups you despise. Everybody hates the Nazis with a passion, at least from the outside, yeah? Like I pointed out before, the origin of hatred lies in the individual's attempt to disown certain potentialities of the self. It's impossible to expurgate unwanted capacities from the self by denying that they exist, so people try to achieve self-acceptance through self-deceit and alienation. PS, there is rarely black and white - it's almost always a spectrum.
The Nobel Laureate James Watson, THE father of DNA, was stripped of his honorary titles over "reprehensible" comments on the link between race and intelligence. He was given the chance to salvage his reputation, but he lived his comments down and refused to buckle under the backlash from the general public. It's completely plausible to link race to intelligence. There are many diseases that affect certain racial groups more than others, which is why prenatal genetic screenings are ethnicity-based. Intelligence and many diseases can be largely based on genetic makeup.
"A trendy style of dressing" type of fashion, is mistaken for good design. Well, it turns out, there are moral fashions, too. Dressing oddly gets you laughed at; but violating moral fashions can get you fired, ostracized, imprisoned, killed, etc.
The statements that make people mad are the ones they worry might be believed. I suspect the statements that make people maddest are those they worry might be true. In every period of history, there seems to have been labels that got applied to statements to shoot them down before anyone had a chance to ask if they were true or not, such as "heresy", "indecent", "improper", "inappropriate", "divisive" ,"psychopathic".etc.
What's the moral fashion here on SS? Act and talk as if you're full of compassion and love and just want to help people?
You SS'ers don't want to attract the "wrong crowd" who get off on other people's sufferings, but how different are you from the "wrong crowd"?
"Ohh, your story makes me feel that I'm not alone." Sounds familiar on SS? Let me rephrase this, many of you find peace in or even get off on reading about other people's sufferings, because you feel less threatened about your chance to thrive by realizing there are people who are even more behind. Few people truly like others who fare better than them, unless they want something from those "others". We humans are competitive in nature. The available resources are always limited and never evenly distributed. A good example is the countless wars that humans have waged against each other for millennia are all about fighting for resources and future survival chance. Seeing other people's success can make you feel threatened and insecure because they're taking away the limited resources that could have been available to you. It's always been "survival of the fittest." The "food chain" applies inter-species, and intra-species.
So again, SS is full of hypocrites, who're more comfortable with being ensconced in a community full of equally or more vulnerable and often "unsuccessful" folks than being out in the open with more competitive people. It protects their wounded ego and calms their nerves. I can understand some SS members have contributed hundreds of posts, but there are a few who happen to be the most zealous activists on keeping the site the way it is that have written whopping thousands of posts on this site, it makes me wonder why they spend SO much time here as if they live on this site.
At this point, I'm rambling and venting a bit. I don't care if any of you SS'ers loves me or hates me, it's not like I want to fuck any of you or depend on you for a better life. Approval from you means nothing to me. The reason why I write this post is some people here do find my thoughts provocative and make them think, not because I have to win some arguments or like to patronize people. I wanted the "Peaceful Pill Handbook", but I don't meet the age requirement, so I came to SS for instructions on the suicide methods, not for seeking friendships. I've been spending more time on the site than I'd like. I need to wean off this site.
With that being said,
@Stan Despite the not-so-friendly posts we exchanged on my deleted thread, I'd like to sincerely thank you for starting that Sodium Nitrite Method mega-thread. I find it very informative, and apparently, you're very intelligent and eloquent. So I do admire you. I don't only like people who agree with me - they're boring.
@Sunshine If one day you need surgeries, do you prefer your surgeon to wince at the sight of your wounds/lesions, shed a few tears of empathy, cover up his/her face with a hand and peek through the fingers while operating on you? Or do you want a surgeon who enjoys what he does and emotionally undisturbed by the sight of however gruesome wounds you have so that he/she can think clearly and act quickly?
Surgeons' competencies are mainly measured by their surgical skills, practical application of medical knowledge, coolheadedness; not on the amount of estrogen that runs through their system, how well they assimilate to the "normal" people. Using an analogy I've used before on my deleted thread, when you pick a P.O.R.N video to watch, the only thing you care about is how quickly it makes you C.U.M, do you also care about whether the producer's intention of making the videos include making money out of you, or the welfare of the actors/actresses?