Discussion Will Donald Trump ban Sanctioned Suicide?

[noname223]

I mean He considered to ban TikTok in order to save it later. It is more of a joke question. This forum is too niche. And this forum seems to die anyway. But is it coincidence since He is in office there are less and less members online? Maybe their suicidality and treatment resistent depressions are now cured by the beacon of hope He symbolizes.

U-S-A!
U-S-A!
U-S-A!

MAGA is the best antidepression. (this is satire)

 

[Pluto]

 

[Magi129]

Ok....... it is a really bad situation for the world that Trump is president of anything, but if he even knows that SS exists I think it would be very funny.
"oh, mr. president, what r u doin?"
"banin some teens on the internet"
like, what the actual f?

 

[Life'sA6itch]

He would if some arse tells him banning it will "save lives."

 

[oneeyed]

He would ban petting puppies if it would make him and his handlers richer

 

[Aloneandinpain]

He's generally quite pro free speech. I don't think anything will change whatsoever, site will be fine but they might target sellers of drugs.

That said, he pardoned the Silk Road guy so things are generally moving in a positive direction overall, at least in terms of allowing unpopular platforms to exist.

 

[Life'sA6itch]

He's generally quite pro free speech. I don't think anything will change whatsoever, site will be fine but they might target sellers of drugs.

That said, he pardoned the Silk Road guy so things are generally moving in a positive direction overall, at least in terms of allowing unpopular platforms to exist.

He is very pro free speech when it works in his favor

 

[needthebus]

He would if some arse tells him banning it will "save lives."

I don't know if that's true. I don't like many of his stances, but he's very pro-free speech, letting people say what they want to say, and is also a realist in some ways, despite being very cruel at times to certain groups of people.

He also has some libertarian tendencies.

 

[Life'sA6itch]

I don't know if that's true. I don't like many of his stances, but he's very pro-free speech, letting people say what they want to say, and is also a realist in some ways, despite being very cruel at times to certain groups of people.

He also has some libertarian tendencies.

I've seen nothing but hatred from him for anyone who is not absolutely fawning over him. And, if he is cruel to "certain groups," do you find that reasonable and proper of the POTUS? I hope not.

 

[needthebus]

I've seen nothing but hatred from him for anyone who is not absolutely fawning over him. And, if he is cruel to "certain groups," do you find that reasonable and proper of the POTUS? I hope not.

My objective commentary on him not being likely to try to ban SaSu is not an endorsement of him.

I would never vote for anyone against trans rights or who is cruel to people because of being Latino. I think war crimes are being committed in Gaza, despite liking Jewish people and being pro-Jew. I'm really not a pro-Trump person, but saying a libertarian free-speech person is going to suddenly shut down a private web site is not believable to me, I'm simply stating the reasons why. I also don't think every single thing he's ever done is irrational or bad, and I don't need to believe that to still dislike his policies. If I could do something somehow to instantly change the leader in power, I would, but I can't, and don't feel obliged to express anger or outrage every time his name is mentioned.

Trump very effectively gained votes by exploiting the delusions of religion, which results in hate because people don't understand science and human nature is inherently vile. I am sorry I don't froth at the mouth every time his name is mentioned? The lack of a swear-word filled diatribe in response to his name isn't somehow an endorsement of his policies.

 

[Grav]

No.

 

[SVEN]

I doubt it. I get the impression he's more of a, "Shit, let 'em post what they like."

 

[locked*n*loaded]

Donald Trump doesn't give one ounce of shit about SS or whether anyone kills themselves. All Donald Trump cares about is Donald Trump. And money.

 

[GlassMoon]

I also think we're under his radar here. And... well... I have a feeling most members are anti-Trump. So no need for him to intervene, from a purely selfish point of view?

 

[Winterreise]

He will ban anything that threaten his power...

Thats the strongman approach that so many now support.

 

[Dr. Finklestein]

Ok....... it is a really bad situation for the world that Trump is president of anything, but if he even knows that SS exists I think it would be very funny.
"oh, mr. president, what r u doin?"
"banin some teens on the internet"
like, what the actual f?

you know I had hoped that SS would be free of idiocy like the poster listed above, apparently not. Here's an idea; if you feel the need to be political here: don't!

 

[RadiantNumber]

He don't even knows about this forum, but also we are protected by section 230, only if this crazy woman who stalked our member would push more he would do this or some pro-lifer would make him pay attention for us but this is also a problem for his followers as I said in the other thread I deleted: if he would revoke 230 his followers and services (like Truth or I don't know how this shit is named) would also be exposed for legal action and I think he cannot change in way it could only affect us

He's generally quite pro free speech. I don't think anything will change whatsoever, site will be fine but they might target sellers of drugs.

That said, he pardoned the Silk Road guy so things are generally moving in a positive direction overall, at least in terms of allowing unpopular platforms to exist.

He is soo fre speech so he banned third gender, if he would really be pro free-speech he would allow to people decide for themselves

 

[noname223]

This night new sanctions gonna be announced. I heard he will sanction sanctioned suicide. I hope democrats will fight against that with the new slogan #UnsanctionSanctionedSuicide. USS. Maybe they could call it aid USS or USSAID

 

[PrismHon]

Has Trump ever talked about suicide? I don't think I've ever heard him speak about it. I'm curious what he would think, not just about this site but about euthanasia, MAID in Canada, Dignitas in Switzerland etc

 

[noname223]

Has Trump ever talked about suicide? I don't think I've ever heard him speak about it. I'm curious what he would think, not just about this site but about euthanasia, MAID in Canada, Dignitas in Switzerland etc

He is allied with fundamental religious people. I think he does not care about religion but his voters do. Conservatives are againist euthanasia. I don't think Trump is an actual conservative but an opportunist.

 

[Custos]

This site isn't American and neither am I, so I don't really care.

 

[Winterreise]

You will gradually notice the algoritms start working in his favor, you will see alot of more social conservative enforcement channels doing smears, shaming, callouts. All this, just a little less subtle and alot more shameless.
And those who tried to warn, are now silent. Supporters are louder than ever. And more threaten than ever, by their own imagination
Usa is psychologically broken. They don't believe anything, but their own imagination. And they have dangerous weapons.
Usa is psychologically broken. They don't believe anything, but their own imagination. And they have dangerous weapons.

 

[Blurry_Buildings]

I also think we're under his radar here. And... well... I have a feeling most members are anti-Trump. So no need for him to intervene, from a purely selfish point of view?

Its a popular republican talking point to call the democrats mentally ill and deranged, at least I hear it a lot. I could see him calling us a product of woke indoctrination if the site became a big enough issue. I'm sure it would just be rhetoric though, he has bigger things to focus on.

It is a common compassionate conservative response, like how they view transgender people as mentally ill and in need of help like conversion therapy and 'finding god' to make them 'normal' again instead of societal acceptance. Die hard republicans are trying to be kind, compassionate, and moral people through their own (imo) warped worldview.

 

[Ijustcantanymore]

Probably not. Most of the people that use this site are all from groups he and the Republicans wish were dead anyway.

 

[Aloneandinpain]

Ironic that this thread exists whilst the Labour Commies in the UK are attacking this site (while simultaneously protecting Muslim rape gangs)

 

[lamy's sacred sleep]

And this forum seems to die anyway

what do you mean by this?