Why don't we know more about Thomas Crooks (the guy of the first Trump assassination attempt)?

[noname223]

Thomas Crooks - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wikipedia: Public opinion polls show that over half of Americans believe that Crooks did not act alone.

Here is official story why we don't have more information on him.

He was killed at the day of the assassination attempt. No interrogation, no trial, no public investigation.

According to the FBI no clear ideological motives, no membership in an extremist group. no published manifesto.
He donated money according to the FBI there was no clear coherent world view.

Compared to other assassins there were less digital traces. (from what we know - how likely is that in the 21st century?) Less chats, no social media radicalization, there were no long online posts that could have explained them motive.

Restraints in the investigation: no accomplice is suspected, personal rights of the family (really when we talk about a Trump assassination attempt?), no public risk posture.

Media strategy: less reporting about him to avoid copy cat terrorists. (how believable is this when we see the reporting about Luigi Mangione)

The meat of the story is certainly not the official narrative. Lol.

I think the weakest arguments were thus far. Personally rights of the family, avoiding copy cat terrorists, restraints in the investigation.
I wouldn't rule it out there were political reasons for not investigating further. Or to publish more about the case publicly.

I could imagine the lonegun man theory is indeed true. The evidence that is known seems to indicate there was no coherent ideology.
And I ask myself if he would have been paid or had support. Wouldn't it have madee more sense to shoot Trump in the chest from that distance? Trying a headshot is pretty risky in that distance. Okay I have read a counterargument for that. Trump usually wears a bulletproof west at rallies. True I didn't consider that...

I think Trump had many enemies. This isn't a counterargument. Foreign intelligence services or the US deep state could have been involved. I don't say I could not imagine it. The police was extremely unprofessional that day. But the lonegunman theory seems to be more likely to me. On the other hand one could say the decisive evidence is held back by the FBI so that people like me come exactly to this position.

What do you think?

 

[DarkRange55]

Are we still waiting on the Warren Commission?

 

[idontknowwhatiam]

Thomas Crooks - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wikipedia: Public opinion polls show that over half of Americans believe that Crooks did not act alone.

Here is official story why we don't have more information on him.

He was killed at the day of the assassination attempt. No interrogation, no trial, no public investigation.

According to the FBI no clear ideological motives, no membership in an extremist group. no published manifesto.
He donated money according to the FBI there was no clear coherent world view.

Compared to other assassins there were less digital traces. (from what we know - how likely is that in the 21st century?) Less chats, no social media radicalization, there were no long online posts that could have explained them motive.

Restraints in the investigation: no accomplice is suspected, personal rights of the family (really when we talk about a Trump assassination attempt?), no public risk posture.

Media strategy: less reporting about him to avoid copy cat terrorists. (how believable is this when we see the reporting about Luigi Mangione)

The meat of the story is certainly not the official narrative. Lol.

I think the weakest arguments were thus far. Personally rights of the family, avoiding copy cat terrorists, restraints in the investigation.
I wouldn't rule it out there were political reasons for not investigating further. Or to publish more about the case publicly.

I could imagine the lonegun man theory is indeed true. The evidence that is known seems to indicate there was no coherent ideology.
And I ask myself if he would have been paid or had support. Wouldn't it have madee more sense to shoot Trump in the chest from that distance? Trying a headshot is pretty risky in that distance. Okay I have read a counterargument for that. Trump usually wears a bulletproof west at rallies. True I didn't consider that...

I think Trump had many enemies. This isn't a counterargument. Foreign intelligence services or the US deep state could have been involved. I don't say I could not imagine it. The police was extremely unprofessional that day. But the lonegunman theory seems to be more likely to me. On the other hand one could say the decisive evidence is held back by the FBI so that people like me come exactly to this position.

What do you think?

I'm not at all a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist but that entire event seemed......... Off....... Staged.

 

[Dinistro]

In my honest opinion, it was staged to get Trump more support from his most loyal fans, as he knew he wouldn't have a chance to gather any new ones from other groups.

The kid that shot at him never actually got shown on reporters camera or even a civilian phone (Unlike Charlie Kirk which had like 8 angles, which is very peculiar considering the fact that one of them is a political debater and the second is an ex president at the time).

About the kid's information, I got to see leaked footage of him in BlackRocks commercial, and considering the fact its most likely the current richest firm in US he had to at least be in touch with some rich influential people, which (if real) would kind of point fingers towards support from a potential Zionist lobby in US (Just wanna state that Zionists and Jewish people are two very different kind of people), especially with recent events when Trump (Who has more ego than everybody else), treats Israels traditions here at the highest state.

When you want people to support you even more, even if you make unhumans laws? Make yourself a victim of opression (In this case scenario Trump being a victim of a left leaning kid with a gun).

That's of course only my opinion and I didn't want it to look like an ethnic issue, more like a foreign country influence, but maybe im digging in too far.

 

[Pessimist]

Because he was unsuccessful and he's dead now, so nobody cares about him.

 

[pax420]

I think he was paid by the trump organization to miss to get trump votes. Then they killed him to keep it quiet. Stranger things have happened.

 

[wine is fine but]

In my honest opinion, it was staged to get Trump more support from his most loyal fans, as he knew he wouldn't have a chance to gather any new ones from other groups

you are thinking of the recent omar stunt

you do realise that someone was killed, and two others were injured in the assassination attempt, so your theory doesn't quite work out

the question that needs to be asked, is why was his digital footprint virtually erased entirely after he was taken in for threatening democrats long before the assassination attempt. and why did trump seem to not know about any of those threats that used key words that are instantly found by the nsa or whoever it is. he gets taken in by the democrats and suddenly, his whole history is virtually erased and then he suddenly turns against the party he allegedly followed. and how did he get to the only position possible to carry out the attempt, without the secret service noticing even thought it was out in the open???? yet, once he fired, they were straight onto him. it is almost like they knew what was going to happen