As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.
I am asking you how you define it/where did you see it in his posts? I am not a fan of progressive new speak btw and terms like "mansplaining" imply that what men have to say is worthless because they are shitheads who have all the power and privilege, or some convoluted crap in that vein.
I'm not an expert in new terms but I'm guessing it was at the "ewww women" part where women gave him responses and he pretty much immediately became hostile and kept insisting that yes, women bond with their rapists or something even though people told him that really wasn't how things work and then claiming he was being victimized because people didn't agree with everything he said and then somehow blamed feminism for some reason
a) I said Eww because that's what women say on threads about men...even in this very thread (!)
Don't patronize me.
this thread is quite the adventure. quality TV. it feels like satire to me.
They didn't say eww about men, they were saying eww about you
Apparently it was about the religion actually (!). What are you talking about. I'm still waiting for a solid justification for why my question should be treated as it has been.
I would suggest some self introspection rather than reacting to everything with immediate hostility, but it does not seem like you would want to do that, you just wanted to fight with people more than you wanted an answer to any question. You had the nerve to go on rants about feminism and sjws or whatever when people were opening up about their trauma to you
I would suggest you try to be a little more respectful of people who ask a question you think is ridiculous.
Yeah I didn't believe it...what is your point? And show me where I mansplained hymens to you.
My first response was pretty respectful even though I made points you didn't like and if that wasn't deferential enough for you then again, this is a pointless thread because you have an idea and don't really want to listen to other people's input
Multiple people have told you something, you don't believe it...ok, then what exactly was the point of the thread? Why start this thread "just asking questions" if you're a Hymen Expert and everyone else is wrong about them
You want to pretend that just because there are varying claims made that asking about people's experiences to refute or back up the claim is a pointless thread? I'd say that goes on quite a bit so it sounds like your bias is still running strong.
Niiice, go with the learning disability. Because I didn't mansplain hymens to you.
An accusation aimed at men usually but not exclusively by radical feminists, which constitutes a logical fallacy, because it attempts to undermine what the man said simply in virtue of being a man, and not based on the substance or arguments he presented. As such, it is a form of ad hominem.
Thank you. I was hoping that the person who used the word would give me some insight into their interpretation of the word but all I got was *crickets.
I have a learning disability that makes me laugh at vagina jokes on the internet
