• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
Darkover

Darkover

Archangel
Jul 29, 2021
5,649
the government has blood on its hands by restricting peaceful suicide methods and forcing people to take more riskier methods

If someone is determined to end their life, restricting access to peaceful methods can push them toward more painful or traumatic alternatives. Many people argue that bodily autonomy should include the right to die on one's own terms, especially when suffering is unbearable.

At the same time, governments often justify these restrictions by claiming they want to prevent impulsive decisions and encourage people to seek help. But if someone has deeply thought it through and still wants out, forcing them into riskier methods seems cruel rather than protective. It's a tough, controversial issue that brings up ethical, legal, and societal debates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dee38, kvorumese, outrider567 and 3 others
Mr.Tristesse

Mr.Tristesse

In tears
Jul 23, 2022
4,929
The mental health system will have my blood on their hands. Not like it matters, they enjoy almost complete unaccountability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kvorumese
Pluto

Pluto

Cat Extremist
Dec 27, 2020
6,739
full
 
  • Yay!
Reactions: lamy's sacred sleep, kvorumese, Forever Sleep and 1 other person
F

Forever Sleep

Earned it we have...
May 4, 2022
15,271
I don't think it is the government going against the wishes of the majority of the population. (For a change.) I think the vast majority of the population also don't want their loved ones killing themselves!

If there really was overwhelming desire that we could all choose to die when we wanted, we'd be seeing more protests- surely? There'd be no opposition to this site whatsover. Parents wouldn't be grieving their children's deaths. They'd be holding 'congratulations' parties.

Surely, the reality of it is that this is largely still a pro-life world. The government is simply pandering to the wants of the majority when they are begging their MP's- please don't let my teenager buy SN off of the internet.

They are actually only denying the rights of a small percentage of people (still wrong in my view,) but they are pandering to the needs of the many.

Where I would argue most strongly is that they assume the small percentage of people who do want out are all mentally incompetent (which I disagree with) and that we can all be helped (which I also disagree with.)

I personally think that ideation should be treated like any illness. Try to ascertain the cause. Try to treat it. Also allow the patient to reject treatment though and be reasonable in considering that some people aren't responding to treatment. With assisted suicide being available after assessment.

It would need to be regulated though. Allowing 'healthy' teenagers unlimited access to peaceful suicide methods clearly wouldn't last. Surely there'd be full on riots if the government enabled that- don't you think?

I understand the frustration completely but I think practically speaking, it just isn't realistic to think governments even could implement this without a full uprising on their hands!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eudaimonic and Flirtingwithdemons