T
The nerd
Student
- Dec 21, 2019
- 116
AMENWow! It took 74 posts before somebody finally got it right!
I would rather masturbate than have sex with someone who is not special.
Then pay with cash.Besides they will check my credit card to see my final purchases. I don't want a prostitute to be it.
Nah, it's the very definition of the word intimate. Sex is for almost all people in this world who aren't mentally ill or otherwise eccentric one of the most intimate things one can do. By the dictionarys definition intimate means among other things: engaged in, involving, or marked by sex, having a sexual relationship.
The sex work industry causes a lot of harm to millions of women all around the world. People get distracted with the few pornstars who perhaps are participating in sex work "by choice", meaning they're white girls who had other options (like college or a career). But those are so few. Most of the women in porn and prostitution today are not there by choice, they were forced to be there somehow and are now stuck - who will hire them after that? I mean you can try and normalize the fact that women are used and sucked dry like objects from the porn industry or normalize their bodies and sexuality as an item that can be bought by 1000+ of horny strangers whenever they please, but that doesn't mean I have to be silent about it. Or even suggest to OP that he should buy empty sex from a prostitute before he CBTs.
>Study after study shows that the primary reason that women begin selling sex for money is out of economic desperation. Moreover, many women in prostitution began before the age of 18; many feel trapped and feel they have no other realistic opportunities for economic survival.
The site you linked is a random page with absolutely no credentials. Several of the links are to pages that admit they are against all sex work, and they don't include any peer-reviewed research or valid findings of any kind. For a source to have any merit it needs to be a *credible* source, because people can say anything on the internet. So instead of the random site you linked, how about one of the world's oldest, most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals like The Lancet? The Thomas Reuter's Foundation, another respected organization that works with news and media outlets around the world, summarizes the findings in this handy article if you don't have an account at The Lancet (they're free to make, btw). In debunking the myths it clearly states their research found most sex workers are *not* being trafficked.
However, in my very first comment I made sure to note that I was referring to adult, consensual sex work. Sex trafficking is a completely different subject, but you keep insisting that a massive majority of "these women" (credible links will also teach you that it's not only women who are sex workers) are forced to be there. Which is an even odder thing, because you call them nasty, say they're sucked dry, all this demeaning language, while simultaneously saying they were all forced into it as minors? If we assume you believe what you say, then you talk about underage abuse victims in an extremely disgusting way.
If you truly wanted to learn, you could do that on your own, so I'm not going to spend time further on this conversation. Accurate information is available on reputable sites and in peer-reviewed journals. If you'd rather Google a phrase that involves the word "prostitute" after I already explained that's a slur and click on whatever pops up, that's your choice. For the record, it's of course fine to disagree with someone's personal choices; that's why it's their life and not yours. But that doesn't mean you get to make up facts just because you don't like how they live their life.
The site you linked is a random page with absolutely no credentials. Several of the links are to pages that admit they are against all sex work, and they don't include any peer-reviewed research or valid findings of any kind. For a source to have any merit it needs to be a *credible* source, because people can say anything on the internet. So instead of the random site you linked, how about one of the world's oldest, most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals like The Lancet? The Thomas Reuter's Foundation, another respected organization that works with news and media outlets around the world, summarizes the findings in this handy article if you don't have an account at The Lancet (they're free to make, btw). In debunking the myths it clearly states their research found most sex workers are *not* being trafficked.
However, in my very first comment I made sure to note that I was referring to adult, consensual sex work. Sex trafficking is a completely different subject, but you keep insisting that a massive majority of "these women" (credible links will also teach you that it's not only women who are sex workers) are forced to be there. Which is an even odder thing, because you call them nasty, say they're sucked dry, all this demeaning language, while simultaneously saying they were all forced into it as minors? If we assume you believe what you say, then you talk about underage abuse victims in an extremely disgusting way.
If you truly wanted to learn, you could do that on your own, so I'm not going to spend time further on this conversation. Accurate information is available on reputable sites and in peer-reviewed journals. If you'd rather Google a phrase that involves the word "prostitute" after I already explained that's a slur and click on whatever pops up, that's your choice. For the record, it's of course fine to disagree with someone's personal choices; that's why it's their life and not yours. But that doesn't mean you get to make up facts just because you don't like how they live their life.
Honestly, I wish you'd check in with yourself, and check yourself.
You have defined this person you don't even know as permanently outraged over everything.
You have defined the OP as incapable.
Do you not hear how belittling you are being?
Do you not hear yourself entering their heads and telling them for themselves who and what they are?
Dude, who talked that way to you first?
Well, I think, if we can't come into an agreement, you should at least try to explain this instead of saying "Lol. You're too young to die. Things get better."
Because this is the kind of thing people hear everyday. It invalidates them and makes them feel worse, and may think that they would be shunned from this site INCLUDING the recovery page because their feelings are invalid. Maybe try explaining this kind of thing to them before you just come down on them, because it sounds a little condescending.
The Judeo-Christian original bible mentions nothing about suicide being a sin. Jesus was extremely compassionate on this issue.if you are religious, most religions disagree with suicide so losing your virginity is a mini sin compared to that one.