N from D : the plot thickens ?

[jgm63]

There's a "bad" copy of the PPH that has the address of D stated as :
d<something>s@<something>

Many people have downloaded that bad copy, and used that bad email address.
The scammer who owns that email address created the bad pdf, and spread it around online.
He then answers those emails, and takes people's money without sending any product.

The official PPH has the address of D stated as :
d<something>z@<something>

So I'm wondering if D might in fact be legitimate ?

Does anyone have info about successful or failed orders for the "d<something>z@<something>" address ?

Note : The bad pdf has been removed from the resources section. More info :

Spoiler: post-519795

https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/what-happened-to-the-pph-march-2019.28686/post-519795

 

[calendulo]

Time ago I had conversations with "s" and he seems to me reliable, and there was some good reports according PPeH and some failures too. Customs I guess.

 

[jgm63]

Time ago I had conversations with "s" and he seems to me reliable, and there was some good reports according PPeH and some failures too. Customs I guess.

The "s" case is the person we know to be a scammer....

The person discussed in the PPH is the "z" case.

I want to know about the "z" case, the person who might be legitimate.

Anyone have any info on D "z" ?

 

[calendulo]

Anyone was scammed by "s"?. If someone was..........sorry in advance.

In six past months I did know nobody............. well, honestly until October.

From October to December I was not around here.

 

[jgm63]

Anyone was scammed by "s"?. If someone was..........sorry in advance.

In six past months I did know nobody............. well, honestly until October.

From October to December I was not around here.

Just to clarify again...

The person whose email address has an "s" before the "@" is a scammer (or at least someone dishonestly promoting their services, but almost certainly a scammer)
The person whose email address has a "z" before the "@" might be legitimate.

I want to see what experiences people have had ordering from the "z" email address.

 

[RainAndSadness]

I never heard of D before and I didn't stumble upon any posts in this forum that reported successful delivery. I would go with C over D every time, considering people in this forum reported successful delivery and confirmed the purity of C's N. Also I can't even list all the benefits of ordering from a darknet market compared to an order via email, which definitely opens a lot of weaknesses to be exploited by a lot of people.

 

[jgm63]

I never heard of D before and I didn't stumble upon any posts in this forum that reported successful delivery. I would go with C over D every time, considering people in this forum reported successful delivery and confirmed the purity of C's N. Also I can't even list all the benefits of ordering from a darknet market compared to an order via email, which definitely opens a lot of weaknesses to be exploited by a lot of people.

ok, thanks.
Some people find ordering from DNM to be too complex, and writing complete step by step one-stop-shop guides is not necessarily always the greatest idea, since that can draw unwanted attention...

For this particular thread, I'm just trying to establish if D might be a reliable source, so I'd prefer to stay mostly on topic.

 

[calendulo]

Just to clarify again...

The person whose email address has an "s" before the "@" is a scammer (or at least someone dishonestly promoting their services, but almost certainly a scammer)
The person whose email address has a "z" before the "@" might be legitimate.

I want to see what experiences people have had ordering from the "z" email address.

Thanks for your clarifying......but according PPeh Mister S has good and bad reports. I do not know about Mister Z
A has good and bad reports.
Everybody has good and bad reports.

I do not know nobody who had buyed anything from S............I know lot of person who have buyed from A.......between them.... myself

About powders.............There is a lab report from an user about purify. Good enough purify. Three months ago

Nobody is legitimate. There is a risk

 

[jgm63]

Thanks for your clarifying......but according PPeh Mister S has good and bad reports. I do not know about Mister Z
A has good and bad reports.
Everybody has good and bad reports.

I do not know nobody who had buyed anything from S............I know lot of person who have buyed from A.......between them.... myself

About powders.............There is a lab report from an user about purify. Good enough purify. Three months ago

Nobody is legitimate. There is a risk

I've edited my original post to make it clearer. Please take a read. If you're still confused, please PM me rather than replying on this thread.

The official PPH has the address of D stated as :
d<something>z@<something>

So I'm wondering if D might in fact be legitimate ?

Does anyone have info about successful or failed orders for the "d<something>z@<something>" address ?

 

[Berlin76]

ok, thanks.
Some people find ordering from DNM to be too complex, and writing complete step by step one-stop-shop guides is not necessarily always the greatest idea, since that can draw unwanted attention...

For this particular thread, I'm just trying to establish if D might be a reliable source, so I'd prefer to stay mostly on topic.

I totally agree with this.
Ever since SS and the people started here drawing out every detail about N from A and other sources. It has gone bad with A operation and people themselves here got raided and people stil dont see the correlation between the blabbering here and raids.

This started when the girl shawn committed suicides who was a member here in june. That's when police even stated they where looking in to Ss because of her case.

So everything is a great source of info for police and try stopping deliveries and raid people. See below quote of the article.

QUOTE)
Shatto's parents saved screenshots of her posts and gave them to police. They now hope to raise awareness that such "evil" websites exist and to hold someone accountable in her death.

"No one gave her an option to live or for help," Bieber told WPMT. "How can these people not be held liable?"

Newberry Township Police Chief Steve Lutz told the York Daily Record that investigators were "looking into" the website, along with claims made by Shatto's family.

‘Evil’ suicide forum encouraged woman to kill herself, relatives say

A young Pennsylvania woman with severe depression and anxiety killed herself after allegedly getting detailed instructions on a site that bills itself as a “pro-choice” suicide forum. Shawn Shatto,…

www.google.com

 

[jgm63]

I totally agree with this.
Ever since SS and the people started here drawing out every detail about N from A and other sources. It has gone bad with A operation and people themselves here got raided and people stil dont see the correlation between the blabbering here and raids.

This started when the girl shawn committed suicides who was a member here in june. That's when police even stated they where looking in to Ss because of her case.

So everything is a great source of info for police and try stopping deliveries and raid people. See below quote of the article.

QUOTE)
Shatto's parents saved screenshots of her posts and gave them to police. They now hope to raise awareness that such "evil" websites exist and to hold someone accountable in her death.

"No one gave her an option to live or for help," Bieber told WPMT. "How can these people not be held liable?"

Newberry Township Police Chief Steve Lutz told the York Daily Record that investigators were "looking into" the website, along with claims made by Shatto's family.

‘Evil’ suicide forum encouraged woman to kill herself, relatives say

A young Pennsylvania woman with severe depression and anxiety killed herself after allegedly getting detailed instructions on a site that bills itself as a “pro-choice” suicide forum. Shawn Shatto,…

www.google.com

It's a tricky balancing act. A site like this will inevitably draw attention.
I think the best we can do is find a middle ground, where information is scattered about a bit here and there.
For the most part I think we sort of do that okay, but yes, there are probably cases where "too much information" is posted on public threads.

I think we could potentially produce a better "new users" guide to better raise awareness of such things, but writing such things is time consuming.
Perhaps I'll have a go a drafting something at some point (if time allows ?), and see if the admins like it.

 

[ViroMajor]

Some years ago, ordered from D (official) and didn't receive anything.
There were varying success reports from Exit members, just not consistantly, and it seems less and less so as time passed. The degree of professionalism in handling business was never there

 

[jgm63]

My latest thinking from search results on this site after sorting by date, is that D at d<something>z@<something> is still not trustworthy....
So perhaps my temporary enthusiasm about the wrong email address was a bit misplaced.

It would be nice to be proven wrong though, so would still like to hear of anyone's experience of ordering from D at d<something>z@<something>