Sunü (素女)
Member
- Sep 30, 2023
- 20
The estimated number increases as time goes on, which can be viewed here. The news article from where I learned it is here, and in the article, there's a short film that you can also watch.
[Excerpt from the article]:
I do not like the idea of labeling this issue as political, but I'm posting it in this subforum to target only the people that can still stomach the news. Depressing as it may be, I believe it still needs to be passed around and talked about. Perhaps charities and organizations can still intervene if their troubles are broadcasted more.
[Excerpt from the article]:
As of November 5th, it estimated that U.S.A.I.D.'s dismantling has already caused the deaths of six hundred thousand people, two-thirds of them children.
The toll is appalling and will continue to grow. But these losses will be harder to see than those of war. For one, they unfold slowly. When H.I.V. or tuberculosis goes untested, unprevented, or inadequately treated, months or years can pass before a person dies. The same is true for deaths from vaccine-preventable illnesses. Another difficulty is that the deaths are scattered. Suppose the sudden withdrawal of aid raises a country's under-five death rate from three per cent to four per cent. That would be a one-third increase in deaths, but hard to appreciate simply by looking around.
The toll is appalling and will continue to grow. But these losses will be harder to see than those of war. For one, they unfold slowly. When H.I.V. or tuberculosis goes untested, unprevented, or inadequately treated, months or years can pass before a person dies. The same is true for deaths from vaccine-preventable illnesses. Another difficulty is that the deaths are scattered. Suppose the sudden withdrawal of aid raises a country's under-five death rate from three per cent to four per cent. That would be a one-third increase in deaths, but hard to appreciate simply by looking around.
The Administration, for its part, has denied causing widespread harm, even as it has made the scale of the damage harder to measure—halting data monitoring and dismissing the inspectors general who might have documented it. This is common in cases of public man-made death. During Mao Zedong's disastrous Great Leap Forward, from 1958 to 1961, the Chinese government released no accurate mortality data. Observers abroad understood that a hunger crisis was under way when China began importing grain, but the scale of the catastrophe was not known until the mid-nineteen-eighties, when the first reliable census allowed historians to calculate that between twenty-three and thirty million people had died.
A fuller accounting of the fallout from U.S.A.I.D.'s shutdown will probably have to await analysis of the United Nations' 2025 mortality statistics, which likely won't appear until 2027.
A fuller accounting of the fallout from U.S.A.I.D.'s shutdown will probably have to await analysis of the United Nations' 2025 mortality statistics, which likely won't appear until 2027.
I do not like the idea of labeling this issue as political, but I'm posting it in this subforum to target only the people that can still stomach the news. Depressing as it may be, I believe it still needs to be passed around and talked about. Perhaps charities and organizations can still intervene if their troubles are broadcasted more.