Really interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Whilst reading that and following my train of thought I couldn't help wondering, where its not acceptable to euthanise the mentally ill and they are expected to "exist" wouldn't it be entirely fair to provide them recreational drugs? Might seem a bit outlandish at first but when you think it through it makes sense. Drugs come with problems that would mostly be avoided if they were provided legally and responsibly. Certain drugs could have massive positive impacts on some peoples quality of life imho. But only if they're provided legally and reliably. They would be clean and unadulterant free. They could be spoken about honestly with a gp and the effects monitored. Opioids can really improve quality of life from a mood perspective. Some stimulants might do too. I think the benefits of each drug would vary from person to person and some drugs would be off the table due to the volatility of them. Cocaine and crack for example don't provide much benefit as they come with a crash which is just likely to worsen things. Cannabis and opioids however, do not. Its a bit off topic so I don't want to start a whole conversation and derail this thread. I just wanted to share what I considered as a result of the article linked in OP.
I think it's fair to say that the OP is a significant and massively important step in the right direction and hopefully marks the first of many around the world. I really hope it sets a president and gains traction.