They'll never prevail with censorship and we will fight every one of their attempts to do so, even if that means having to take drastic measures to do so. We will fight hard to preserve freedom of information and speech.
@Marquis
I am curious as to how this would come about in the real world.
I understand the wisdom of not revealing one's tactics to an enemy; and yet, how can we as members who daily use this site as a resource and vulnerably share our pain, as well as the non-members who daily use this resource, have faith that the SS leadership has not only the intention to represent us as a collective and to fight, but the means and the strategy to do so?
Without evidence to support these claims of intentions to fight, I respectfully assert that it is rhetoric which stirs up the suicidal masses. Your words are powerful; but without correlating action, they are, at best, just words, and at worst, manipulation to serve an unrevealed agenda.
I believe true leaders can and will stand up to questioning, and so I question you here. I believe true leadership is service, and that leaders are responsible to those whom they serve, and so I ask here: Beyond providing a support platform, how does SS intend to actively serve me as a member, and actively serve the ideals of pro-choice and free speech? The SS platform is made public, it is inherently political; I ask: What are the intentions for making posts public and therefore engaging in the political sphere -- is it to openly engage in battle over the right to determine one's own death, or to subversively serve a different agenda?
In January, there was a stickied thread: "The changes that were made to the site have been reversed for the time-being." I posted this comment there:
Curious as to who provides the funding to maintain the site. Too many features for a free platform.
@Marquis ?
@SinisterKid ?
I received no public or private response. So I researched. I discovered SS began on the dark web, and that the owner of the site chooses anonymity. Anyone here can research and find this information by searching website ownership and the history of SS.
From the Bible to John F. Kennedy, it is warned that what is done in secret is up to no good.
I have publicly asked in this post direct and reasonable questions. Without direct, reasonable, and public responses, I have valid reason to suspect that SS and its leadership are wolves in sheep's clothing, and that the public posts of my heart to meet my and others' needs are being used, or will potentially be used, as tools to serve an agenda.
@Marquis, how do you respond? With silence, or with service?