Dejected 55
Visionary
- May 7, 2025
- 2,196
Let's not get it twisted... many men and many women judge based on looks. How can they not? Outside of meeting people on an online site without photos, you're going to know what someone looks like long before you know anything else about them.
What is debatable is what women look for in physical appearance VS what men look for in physical appearance... and, in part due to physical differences in men and women, that's where things get different. Women tend to value physical size (height, athleticism, strength, etc.) because finding those things in a man tends to support the historical need for security and protection and taking care of her, children, and the home. Men, as already has been stated, tend to look for health and youth and certain attributes in breasts and hips that imply better chance of healthy children. If you're going to acknowledge history and caveman stuff in how people see each other, you have to acknowledge it plays in both directions.
Are men pickier than women in terms of evaluating looks? I don't know. Even though I have often thought I was ugly by male standards, I've never gotten the feeling that my looks were what were keeping women from being interested in me. Maybe it has and I was oblivious to it. Also, from the reverse angle... I've been attracted to women of all shapes and sizes and nationalities in my life and more than a few times women I've found really attractive to me were ones others around me wouldn't look once at, much less twice. So while I acknowledge I've had some physical attractions purely based on looks before I got to know a woman... I don't think I've unfairly judged a woman solely based on physical appearance. I can't say, though, that there couldn't be a perfectly nice and kind human being that I find her not physically attractive and it would be a deal breaker... anymore that I can't say that a woman out there might not like me for my appearance even if she liked me as a human being.
It's a part of things, but it isn't all the things.
What is debatable is what women look for in physical appearance VS what men look for in physical appearance... and, in part due to physical differences in men and women, that's where things get different. Women tend to value physical size (height, athleticism, strength, etc.) because finding those things in a man tends to support the historical need for security and protection and taking care of her, children, and the home. Men, as already has been stated, tend to look for health and youth and certain attributes in breasts and hips that imply better chance of healthy children. If you're going to acknowledge history and caveman stuff in how people see each other, you have to acknowledge it plays in both directions.
Are men pickier than women in terms of evaluating looks? I don't know. Even though I have often thought I was ugly by male standards, I've never gotten the feeling that my looks were what were keeping women from being interested in me. Maybe it has and I was oblivious to it. Also, from the reverse angle... I've been attracted to women of all shapes and sizes and nationalities in my life and more than a few times women I've found really attractive to me were ones others around me wouldn't look once at, much less twice. So while I acknowledge I've had some physical attractions purely based on looks before I got to know a woman... I don't think I've unfairly judged a woman solely based on physical appearance. I can't say, though, that there couldn't be a perfectly nice and kind human being that I find her not physically attractive and it would be a deal breaker... anymore that I can't say that a woman out there might not like me for my appearance even if she liked me as a human being.
It's a part of things, but it isn't all the things.