data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41cf7/41cf71832221557b37d94b30628ad36dd9a4677c" alt="leloyon"
leloyon
I'll see you in the Wired.
- Feb 4, 2023
- 1,185
As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.
Yeah I mean it's mostly just wishful thinking on my part. I still think it's unlikely that we have anything more than nothingness after death But I often wonder how things would have been if I was born into different circumstances. Like I hate my life now, but I often long for a life where I was born into the right body and where I could be happy. I guess it's interesting to think about what could have been. I've come to accept whatever comes after.
So what is your theory then in the case of those of us who CTB "before our time" and take it into our own hands? We reincarnate in the same set of circumstances?
Great video! I looked it up and linking it here -
Really enjoyed reading this thread - I think something akin to an amalgamation of everything written here. It's hard to say…
If - according to the egg video, we are filled with the wisdom of previous lives I hope to make better choices in my next…
No one wants to suffer - inherently I think we all seek to leave meaningful and purpose driven lives but for whatever reason that hasn't been the case for us.. bc if it had been we wouldnt be here!
So why not take the chance of starting over in the next.
I think you misunderstand the graphic; when it says you "wind up in the same conditions when you die", it is referring to the death-state, the state you were in before birth. It says nothing about dying before your time or reincarnating in the same set of circumstances.So what is your theory then in the case of those of us who CTB "before our time" and take it into our own hands? We reincarnate in the same set of circumstances?
This idea is known as "generic subjective continuity" or GSC. There are a few issues with it, but one in particular that I'd like to point out, which is the question of order of lives lived, further complicated by the absence of global time between lives.Well, I'd like to believe that everything is simply done, that there's nothing happening and nobody to complain about being bored about it. Kind of like hoping for heaven, which would also be nice. My observations into consciousness seem to point to other possibilities. As I've grown closer to death these ideas are a bit terrifying. I'm not a neuroscientist or spiritual master, so it's not as though my own ideas have any bearing but…
If we are framing consciousness here as being the direct act of reality continuing itself in individual experience, then when I die, reality continues. I may be 'dead', but consciousness, this universe perpetuating the fact that it lives itself, will continue. Some spiritual systems call this 'reincarnation' but I view it as more of a natural continuation of consciousness on a mass scale.
Where am I going with this?
Well, while 'I' may be dead, the consciousness which I call 'I', the unique perspective I have on life and the universe, is not in itself unique in the sense that it inhabits every conscious being in this universe. Therefore, if 'I' die, the closest thing to anything I could name as being that 'I' in the first place can and will continue to inhabit various forms.
In other words, I may die, but that which makes the fact of my life significant does not die.
I do not say this optimistically, it causes me a sort of cosmic terror. I could kill myself, but consciousness would not end. It would continue inhabiting a seemingly endless number of forms which are equally a unique part of universal experience as I was. In that sense, what ever dies?
If there is ever anything real or solid enough to call 'me' that even can die, it would stand to reason that it is not limited to my body, and will continue to inhabit beings who will, suffer, experience tortures worse than I experience now. Joys too but…it's hard to look at the joys with the fact of the cruelty in this world.
Anyway, thanks for reading my pseudo philosophical rant.
This idea is known as "generic subjective continuity" or GSC. There are a few issues with it, but one in particular that I'd like to point out, which is the question of order of lives lived, further complicated by the absence of global time between lives.
Are you familiar with the vertiginous question? Phenomenologically, only one perspective can be 'live' at a time. Supposing that we are phenomenal realists (i.e., believe that phenomenal consciousness is real and not an illusion like illusionists claim) about consciousness and qualia, any metaphysical theory claiming to address questions of personal identity and consciousness must account for the phenomenal property of being oneself exclusively.
Very interesting diagram! Where's it from? (out of curiosity; a neat find, for sure!)
Found it on 4chan's /x/ (paranormal) board, if I recall correctly. Wouldn't bother going there, it's 99% shit if I'm honest (as should be expected of halfchan).Very interesting diagram! Where's it from? (out of curiosity; a neat find, for sure!)
If the passage of time is understood as being strictly phenomenal as it is in a block universe, then global time does not pass between lives. Furthermore, if there is any passage in-between, it would exist outside of the context of 'global time.'When you say questions of order of lives or absence of global time between lives I don't have the context to understand your idea. Could you further break these terms down more for me so I can better understand them?
This is an excellent question. I don't have an answer for you because this is in fact part of the quadrilemma that faces any theory of consciousness. I will point you toward Christian List's work: https://academic.oup.com/pq/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pq/pqae053/7686655With regard to the second paragraph and GSC, and with the vertiginous question in mind, how does a framework which takes into account these ideas and accepts them for the sake of analysis (only one perspective can be 'live' at a time, presupposing phenomenal realism) relate to the fact of other phenomenal perspectives seeming to exist even within the framework of a single living perspective? In other words, if we are accepting that these ideas can be grounded in a realistic assessment of the conscious situation, how do they then account for the fact that it then seems, even from within that framework, that other perspectives at least seem to live and act and breathe, seeming to be present in an (admittedly unique and self contained) conscious context?
Thanks for this response!If the passage of time is understood as being strictly phenomenal as it is in a block universe, then global time does not pass between lives. Furthermore, if there is any passage in-between, it would exist outside of the context of 'global time.'
This is an excellent question. I don't have an answer for you because this is in fact part of the quadrilemma that faces any theory of consciousness. I will point you toward Christian List's work: https://academic.oup.com/pq/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pq/pqae053/7686655
Nothing. I hate to always mention it, but it's more relevant on this forum than anywhere else, i've already died. Could be that you end up in whatever afterlife you believe in. I'm an atheist, there was nothing in my experience. Could be that souls exist and mine hadn't left my body, could be that an angel didn't carry my soul into the afterlife yet. No way to know.I guess I'm at a point in my life where I genuinely don't know what happens after I die.
I think the most likely possibility is that nothing happens, just like before you were born. Being a trans person If one of the religions are right then I'm screwed, religious people always told me that god still loves me but I'd probably end up going to hell. I feel like it's not very likely though. Something that always interested me was "the egg" story (kurzgesagt made a really interesting video on it). I mean as far as theories go it makes the most sense to me, if there is something after death. I do however think nothingness is more likely.
The one thing that always fascinated me with death was that there was no way to tell what happens with a 100% certainty. Whatever happens I'm kind of glad that I can leave this life behind at least. If there's a next one after death or not.
So did you die and essentially feel like you immediately woke up? Were you aware of nothingness or did time not exist and there simply was nothing aside from death and you being brought back?Nothing. I hate to always mention it, but it's more relevant on this forum than anywhere else, i've already died. Could be that you end up in whatever afterlife you believe in. I'm an atheist, there was nothing in my experience. Could be that souls exist and mine hadn't left my body, could be that an angel didn't carry my soul into the afterlife yet. No way to know.
Exactly this. The way I've described it was teleportation, I was on the bed and then all of a sudden I was being revived by paramedics on the floor. It felt like no time had passed at all. As I was in the process of dying however, for just a little bit, I had weak awareness of noises around me and feelings, but I wasn't conscious enough for my brain to really process it or for it to mean anything. It's all a blur. There was nothing when I died, nothing at all. Try to think back to before you were born, just lack of existence. The void.So did you die and essentially feel like you immediately woke up? Were you aware of nothingness or did time not exist and there simply was nothing aside from death and you being brought back?