• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
S

Socrates Respecter

Member
Apr 23, 2023
50
It may look like a good one, but not without its problems I suppose. Like, the power is not high enough to actually kill a person it seems. so its likely one would just suffer a terrible injury.

Any thoughts guys?
 
CW36

CW36

➕〰️➰
Jul 23, 2023
839
Are we talking London tubes? For some reason it appeals to people right. But the reality is that the underground survival rate sits at around 33%. Overground is more successful because obviously you can get hit outside of the station stops, where the trains hit much higher speeds.
 
soonatpeace777888

soonatpeace777888

Specialist
Jul 4, 2023
386
Electrocution is a horrendous way to die and is not even guarenteed to kill you. The results from failure are some of the most brutal and debilitating of any method.
 

Similar threads