lucien_lee
Member
- Mar 10, 2023
- 19
We wanted to share a quick update with the community.
Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.
👉 View the ledger here
Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Horrible.
Jesus... That's awful
atp i srsly don't give a shit it was easy for me to get and according to the case file there's no known cureI believe that was also the method chosen by Isabella Blow, the mentor of Alexander McQueen. A horrible choice in both cases.
lmao got no will to live but still scared of pain?Judging by the replies I don't think I even wish to know what it is.
You've been reported. Get the fuck out of this place, kiddo.lmao got no will to live but still scared of pain?
It's debatable and what is the definition of "better". I am not trying to be antagonist but as analytical as possible. For many the paraquat method has achieved the desired result. SN has failed individuals. So which is better?!Try sn, it is still way better than that
You come off as an antagonist. There are resources here, on this forum, for the methods. Read them. Find the best, for you.It's debatable and what is the definition of "better". I am not trying to be antagonist but as analytical as possible. For many the paraquat method has achieved the desired result. SN has failed individuals. So which is better?!
I read many goodbye threads here, and there was one too which contained all attempts and by reading all that it is pretty much visible that people who fail either don't take antiemetic and vomit or take less amount (25gm is enough), so that's why I thought it may be a good method and also it knocks a person off and one only experiences nausea, headache, burning in throat, and after 10 or 12 minutes he is unconscious, so one don't has to suffer much.It's debatable and what is the definition of "better". I am not trying to be antagonist but as analytical as possible. For many the paraquat method has achieved the desired result. SN has failed individuals. So which is better?!
Fair comment. I have ordered SN and I am waiting on delivery so that says something I guess.I read many goodbye threads here, and there was one too which contained all attempts and by reading all that it is pretty much visible that people who fail either don't take antiemetic and vomit or take less amount (25gm is enough), so that's why I thought it may be a good method and also it knocks a person off and one only experiences nausea, headache, burning in throat, and after 10 or 12 minutes he is unconscious, so one don't has to suffer much.