
InkBlot
What Do You See?
- Sep 17, 2018
- 162
Stats prove it. You are the one who gave anecdotal evidence to try to discredit the stats. I listed an experts opinion in his field and stats. You would have to compare the stats on cops missing their intending to targets to other groups etc not give an explanation.
List his name. Prove he worked as a cop, and that he owns a security company. Show evidence. Otherwise its an anecdote, one mans word vs another. Its a proven fact that shots at the range vs shots under stress and pressure are effective at only half range or less. Thats what I was stating.
I researched your claim, 1 in 10 shots. Evidence was closer to 3 in 10. But that isnt universal, shots fired vs shots hit is not tracked across the country as well as it should be.
Again, this isn't furthering anything. I'm done with this conversation. A cop is a better shot than you, and probably a better shot than me. Become a cop, get put in those situations and then you can make decisions on a cops accuracy. Deuces.