• UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.

  • Hey Guest,

    Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.

    This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.

    In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].

    Read our statement here:

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC): 34HyDHTvEhXfPfb716EeEkEHXzqhwtow1L
    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
A

Aliaiactaest

Student
Jun 7, 2019
184
This is an interesting moral question that recent events have raised.

Let's say a user has ordered and successfully received N. The people who have done so are generally serious about their eventual intentions. They may not be ready to CTB tomorrow, but they definitely want to do so.

Let's say another user reports that there is a significantly enhanced chanced of the N. being seized. This person, not wanting to lose the N. decides to catch an earlier bus.

What is the moral issue if 1.) the user is intentionally reporting a false story; 2.) the user is spreading a rumor which may or may not be true; and 3.) the user is reporting a personal experience that he knows to be true?

@onlymehere can weigh in since he has definite opinions.
 
M

Miserable

Student
Jul 14, 2019
117
I'm too much of a noob to understand maybe, but if the person already posses the N then why would they be rushed? And if they don't have the N why would they use another method?
 
C

calendulo

Enlightened
Jun 13, 2019
1,016
I do not see any moral question.
All the sentences are thruths.
There is a chance of N being seized. Yes, there is. Customs exist for these matters.Will be countries better and there will be worse.

If for any reason an user does not received your N, I already is a lier and reporting hoax and fake story. It's unfair.

Until I received N, I read enough.and It's very clear......... here there is people who is buying a "quite" boxes.

And suppose that even will be others sellers...or dealers.
 

Similar threads

Olivie_
Replies
1
Views
125
Suicide Discussion
SomewhatLoved
SomewhatLoved
SmokingCivet
Replies
54
Views
4K
Suicide Discussion
taylorj
taylorj