bugfart
12x mental hospital stays
- May 21, 2023
- 30
Think about it. Men's key issues is "I don't want to work to support a family or fulfill masculine gender roles". "I don't want to support a woman". "I'd prefer to be feminine". "Men can't cry". And by no means am I a conservative. But ok. Now men can sit on their ass all day and make their wife do all the working and cooking and cleaning and child rearing and stay gaming all day. Everything hinges on the women or else the kids starve or if no kids are involved, they starve should something happen to her with some of the "feminist" arrangements people have. I don't agree with a man 100% paying for a woman because the hand that feeds can cut off that food and support and abuse a woman. But the things that men have done to me and the arrangements that are acceptable are not ok. Im a full time student taking 15 credit hours and I aim to do a masters degree eventually. My boyfriend does nothing. I pay for his shit and he acts like a typical in fact stereotypical abusive man.
He paints his nails and listens to indie music and he cries- a lot- but he is still abusive. He is abusive and weaponizes his feelings. He isn't grateful for the fact that I pay for him. He says he is a communist and a feminist therefore he doesn't believe in working and I should pay for things. He claims it is sexist and ableist if I ask him to get a job and he calls me a bitch and all the slurs on the book but because of what kind of man and the male feminism he subscribes to he says it's ok to call me a bitch and a whore because I deserve it for "gaslighting" him, and being "sexist" to him for asking that he pick up some slack, among other buzzwords. All this does is give a wolf sheep's clothing. A man can wear a pearl necklace, cry, go to therapy and use therapy words against women, not work, paint their nails, use alternative pronouns (whilst still being male), and they are still not good men. So I'm wondering why the focus is on "ohh sweet baby you're included in feminism now and the fact that you can't cry and can't paint your nails and can't wear a dress and that you have to ensure your kids and wife don't starve is so much more important than the issues actual women go through!"
Why did everyone make the whole club about them? Why is it about men and diverse identities instead of the problems women go through? Even historically when involving everyone in feminism nothing went right. For example- Seneca falls convention was the earliest convention for women's right to vote. Slavery abolitionists were involved and nothing ended up coming from it due to the need to have everyone involved and not enough support and focus on women. Women had to bomb and commit arson and do massive protests later on to win the right to vote and historically men were "feminists" similar to that of today in that they believed they were doing women a service to restrict them from voting to "protect them", because they believed women were weak. All of us with a brain support women's right to vote now. But back then, if you asked the average man, they probably would've disagreed.
They can go around doing fake performative activism like "sex work is work" because they want as much sex as possible and view women as public property instead of private property and want to silence victims of sex trafficking and claim that 13 year old trafficked girls are just "prudes" and "not sex positive enough" and ignoring major reform at the very least that's needed with prostitution/ sex work. 89% of women want to leave prostitution and most of them have started or been forced underage. They go around saying "free the nipple" not because they care, but because they want to see nipples and they are sexual predators and view women as public property.
They go around advocating for polyamory despite not being ethical in their polyamorous arrangements and again, because they view women as public property and don't want to commit because under certain economic theories when taken to extremes without ethics/ intersectionality like communism or socialism: if they don't see women as full people, they see them as property, and if they see property as public, they see women as public property. Therefore they want as much sex as possible from all directions in an almost cult leader like fashion. It's all an act. At most they care about economics and occasionally racial issues but stand exactly the same as conservative men on women- just with a "public property" view instead of a "private property" view. It's well established that conservative men are not good men. They would make all women barefoot and pregnant and stripped of rights if they could. They are wolves who don't hide it. The majority of "male feminists" are those same wolves but in pearl necklaces and painted nails and he/they pronouns.
Men like Hassan are a shining example of this. He's a nepotism baby, doesn't do much work, owns a mansion, rapes illegally trafficked women in Berlin and brags about it, is misogynistic to women but claims it's ok because they're white or whatever excuse he wants to choose. All while wearing a pearl necklace or painting his nails because that's what matters right? Not the women or any systemic issues women go through apparently.
He paints his nails and listens to indie music and he cries- a lot- but he is still abusive. He is abusive and weaponizes his feelings. He isn't grateful for the fact that I pay for him. He says he is a communist and a feminist therefore he doesn't believe in working and I should pay for things. He claims it is sexist and ableist if I ask him to get a job and he calls me a bitch and all the slurs on the book but because of what kind of man and the male feminism he subscribes to he says it's ok to call me a bitch and a whore because I deserve it for "gaslighting" him, and being "sexist" to him for asking that he pick up some slack, among other buzzwords. All this does is give a wolf sheep's clothing. A man can wear a pearl necklace, cry, go to therapy and use therapy words against women, not work, paint their nails, use alternative pronouns (whilst still being male), and they are still not good men. So I'm wondering why the focus is on "ohh sweet baby you're included in feminism now and the fact that you can't cry and can't paint your nails and can't wear a dress and that you have to ensure your kids and wife don't starve is so much more important than the issues actual women go through!"
Why did everyone make the whole club about them? Why is it about men and diverse identities instead of the problems women go through? Even historically when involving everyone in feminism nothing went right. For example- Seneca falls convention was the earliest convention for women's right to vote. Slavery abolitionists were involved and nothing ended up coming from it due to the need to have everyone involved and not enough support and focus on women. Women had to bomb and commit arson and do massive protests later on to win the right to vote and historically men were "feminists" similar to that of today in that they believed they were doing women a service to restrict them from voting to "protect them", because they believed women were weak. All of us with a brain support women's right to vote now. But back then, if you asked the average man, they probably would've disagreed.
They can go around doing fake performative activism like "sex work is work" because they want as much sex as possible and view women as public property instead of private property and want to silence victims of sex trafficking and claim that 13 year old trafficked girls are just "prudes" and "not sex positive enough" and ignoring major reform at the very least that's needed with prostitution/ sex work. 89% of women want to leave prostitution and most of them have started or been forced underage. They go around saying "free the nipple" not because they care, but because they want to see nipples and they are sexual predators and view women as public property.
They go around advocating for polyamory despite not being ethical in their polyamorous arrangements and again, because they view women as public property and don't want to commit because under certain economic theories when taken to extremes without ethics/ intersectionality like communism or socialism: if they don't see women as full people, they see them as property, and if they see property as public, they see women as public property. Therefore they want as much sex as possible from all directions in an almost cult leader like fashion. It's all an act. At most they care about economics and occasionally racial issues but stand exactly the same as conservative men on women- just with a "public property" view instead of a "private property" view. It's well established that conservative men are not good men. They would make all women barefoot and pregnant and stripped of rights if they could. They are wolves who don't hide it. The majority of "male feminists" are those same wolves but in pearl necklaces and painted nails and he/they pronouns.
Men like Hassan are a shining example of this. He's a nepotism baby, doesn't do much work, owns a mansion, rapes illegally trafficked women in Berlin and brags about it, is misogynistic to women but claims it's ok because they're white or whatever excuse he wants to choose. All while wearing a pearl necklace or painting his nails because that's what matters right? Not the women or any systemic issues women go through apparently.
