Downdraft
I've felt better ngl
- Feb 6, 2024
- 765
Don't worry, I understand the message.Ppl r nt bannd bcse thy snd a 'specfc ag'
Thy r occasnlly verfid in anonymty-respctng wy if thr wrds & b-havrs r comng acrss as ovrly yng -- alng wth othr ag-identfyng info
Th/ persn wh/ ws refrrd 2 in th/ thred ws opn tht thy wre in hgh-schl - ppl cn b in hgh-schl frm 14-15 yrs old & dspite wht mdia & othr lw-IQ follwrs of webste lke t/ claim SaSu ds *nt* wnt minrs on th/ ste & mods r alwys takng possblty of minrs presnce on ste v sersly
Th/ topcs dscussd on sasu r senstve & of mture natre & mods tke all measres pssble t/ mitg8 rsks of minrs accssng frum whle simtansly allowng membrs t/ kp th/ anonymty whch gves thm sfe plce t/ xpress thmslves
If othr membrs hve ideas of bettr wys t/ mange thse 2 issus in tandem thn pls fl free t/ spk up
The other user saying you guys banned on "sound" concerned me and had to clarify, maybe I could've put it in a more neutral way.
I know about the law, that SS accepts no minors, and I was NOT suggesting them to come. I was just concerned adult users could be unfairly banned, but it seems not.
If I can ask, what way of age verification can be anonymous and people don't lie?
Last edited: