TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,551
Most of us here on SaSu have known that forced-lifers often push CTB prevention rhetoric or even intervene against those they know to have been planning, are going to attempt, or even attempting (and failing) CTB, including temporary detainment and custody of said individual person(s) who CTB. Then they also spew platitudes and encouragement to live as well as dissuade, discourage, and even oppose any thought, idea, or even hint of CTB. They often do so paternalistically and aggressively.
So it is well established that most of us all agree that encouraging or pushing someone towards CTB is unacceptable, immoral, and against the pro-choice philosophy as well as ethics and principles. Both pro-choicers (most of us here on SaSu and even those outside of SaSu). Encouraging or pushing someone towards CTB is that of a pro-mortalist perspective and is highly frowned upon because it contradicts the axiom of pro-choice philosophy itself.
With that said, the flipside is true too; if the encouragement or pushing of one towards CTB is not only reprehensible to everyone, not just limited to forced-lifers, but also pro-choicers alike, then similarly, it is also immoral and unethical for forced-lifers (aka pro-lifers) to push the idea of living onto everyone else, including those who do NOT enjoy life/sentience itself! In short, most of our contention and constant conflict with forced-lifers are because of the lack of respect or choice when it comes to one wanting to check out on one's own terms!
So it is well established that most of us all agree that encouraging or pushing someone towards CTB is unacceptable, immoral, and against the pro-choice philosophy as well as ethics and principles. Both pro-choicers (most of us here on SaSu and even those outside of SaSu). Encouraging or pushing someone towards CTB is that of a pro-mortalist perspective and is highly frowned upon because it contradicts the axiom of pro-choice philosophy itself.
With that said, the flipside is true too; if the encouragement or pushing of one towards CTB is not only reprehensible to everyone, not just limited to forced-lifers, but also pro-choicers alike, then similarly, it is also immoral and unethical for forced-lifers (aka pro-lifers) to push the idea of living onto everyone else, including those who do NOT enjoy life/sentience itself! In short, most of our contention and constant conflict with forced-lifers are because of the lack of respect or choice when it comes to one wanting to check out on one's own terms!
