sugarb
thief of silent dreams
- Jun 14, 2024
- 797
So long as the baby's not past a certain point of development, I don't care. I'm not particularly well educated on the subject beyond the basics, so I can't take a stance on when exactly that point should be, but abortions should be legal before that point. I wouldn't want my female family members or friends to be forced into pregnancy and childbirth with all the risks and dangers that come with it.
That said, while I do still have sympathy for mothers carrying children who're past whatever that developmental point is, barring exceptions for rape, incest, and threat to life/wellness it becomes infanticide and the bodily autonomy of a mother who can safely deliver should be temporarily ignored.
As an analogy- Person A is hanging over a chasm holding onto a rope tied around Person B's leg. Unless 1. Person A is going to die or lose their leg unless the rope is cut or 2. Person B is going to lose their grip and fall anyway, I don't think it's morally sound for Person A's rope to be cut because it's inconvenient or temporarily painful, despite it violating bodily autonomy.
That said, while I do still have sympathy for mothers carrying children who're past whatever that developmental point is, barring exceptions for rape, incest, and threat to life/wellness it becomes infanticide and the bodily autonomy of a mother who can safely deliver should be temporarily ignored.
As an analogy- Person A is hanging over a chasm holding onto a rope tied around Person B's leg. Unless 1. Person A is going to die or lose their leg unless the rope is cut or 2. Person B is going to lose their grip and fall anyway, I don't think it's morally sound for Person A's rope to be cut because it's inconvenient or temporarily painful, despite it violating bodily autonomy.