Are organized sports more of a negative than a positive?
Is mountain climbing more of a negative than a positive?
Is hang-gliding more of a negative than a positive?
Is parachuting more of a negative than a positive?
Is reading romance novels more of a negative than a positive?
Are movies and TV more of a negative than a positive?
Is reading news (print or online) or watching news (TV or Internet) more of a negative than a positive?
Is reading any kind of book more of a negative than a positive?
I could go on...
People get their panties in a twist over some thing they don't like and decide it must therefore be harmful to others. Oh, that dude who killed someone liked to play Dungeons & Dragons so it must have corrupted him and made him evil because he never killed anyone before he played that game! I wish people weren't so damn stupid about this stuff... and I wish corrupt people wouldn't keep latching on to stupid shit to deflect from real problems.
Do you know that the world, on average, destroys more than enough food than would be needed to feed all the hungry people of the world? Think about that... we are already paying for the food that gets wasted and destroyed and people are starving and we could literally end world hunger in the blink of an eye if we brought people to the food or brought the food to the people... but too many want to argue over "charity" and "welfare state" and "how will we afford it" and shit, when we literally already pay for, then waste the food rather than let people eat it. Maybe too many video games is causing world hunger? If we pretend that it does, could we feed people? I'll blame video games IF we will actually feed the people once we "eliminate" the evil video games that are stopping people from getting the food.
*sigh*