• Hey Guest,

    We will never comply with any of OFCOM's demands or any other nations censorious demands for that matter. We will only follow the laws of the land of which our server is located, which is the US.

    Any demands for censorship or requests to comply with the law outside of the US will be promptly ignored.

    No foreign laws or pressure will make us comply with anti-censorship laws and we will protect the speech of our members, regardless of where they might live in the world. If that means being blocked in the UK, so be it. We would advise that any UK member gets a VPN to browse the site, or use TOR.

    However, today, we stand up these these governments that want to bully or censor this website.

    Fuck OFCOM, and fuck any media organization or group that think it's cool or fun to stalk or bully people that suffering in this world.

    Edit: We also wanted to address the veiled threats made against a staff member in the UK by the BBC in the news today. We are undeterred by any threats, intimination, by the BBC or by any other groups dedicated to doxxing and harassing our staff and members. Journalists from the BBC, CTV, Kansas Star, Daily Mail and many other outlets have continuiously ignored the fact that many of the people that they're interviewing (such as @leelfc84 on Twitter/X) and propping up are the same people posting addresses of staff members and our founders on social media. We show them proof of this and they ignore it and don't address it.They're all just as evil as each other, and should be treated accordingly. They do not care about the safety of our staff members, founders, or administrators, or even members, so why would they care about you?

    Now that we have your attention, journalists, will you ever address this? You've given these evil people interviews, and free press.

W

wanttodie12345

Member
Jul 27, 2024
99
I've been going cross eyed trying to research the debate about antacids and SN. I've read the guides, success/unsuccessful reports, I know the PPH no longer suggests them. Is there any anecdotal "data" to suggest not taking antacids really does lend to quicker unconsciousness? If antacids are used, are certain antacids preferable? Chewable vs tablets to swallow vs liquid? Any links to threads or posts would be appreciated! I've been leaning towards a smaller dose of antacid than the PPH used to recommend. Maybe that's a decent compromise?
 
A

Aprilfarewell4

Wizard
Apr 9, 2024
612
a soul took maalox tablets with water last night when he crossed over with SN. 3 times the dose recommended on the label. PPH info I heard today says none of the adjuncts to SN are necessary. they may just help IF someone experiences side effects. SN is considered a peaceful passing.
 
Last dance

Last dance

Forver 23
Aug 7, 2024
63
Here is your answer: Antacids does NOT make absorption quicker. Therefore it has no effect on how long until youre unconcious. Its not used for that.

So the purpose of antacid is to help reduce a chemical conversion so more SN moves into the small intestine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sarros and cowboypants
W

wanttodie12345

Member
Jul 27, 2024
99
Here is your answer: Antacids does NOT make absorption quicker. Therefore it has no effect on how long until youre unconcious. Its not used for that.

So the purpose of antacid is to help reduce a chemical conversion so more SN moves into the small intestine.
Thank you for your response. I'm wondering though if the chemical conversion actually produces a chemical that contributes to lowering blood pressure and unconsciousness. I guess I'm wondering if that idea is just a theory or if there has been any evidence (or as much evidence as we can see without actual testing obviously)
This is the post that has me wondering:
 

Similar threads

J
Replies
17
Views
591
Suicide Discussion
Cakeisalie
Cakeisalie
Mayonaise
Replies
8
Views
897
Suicide Discussion
Onelegman
Onelegman
randomeyes11
Replies
4
Views
436
Suicide Discussion
dying flower
D