The forum itself was founded by two men, according to a New York Times investigation, who run a number of websites for "incels". Wanting to retrace her sister's last steps, Walton visited the forum herself. "A lot of the posts are basically saying, 'Your family don't care about you', 'You should do it'. 'When are you going to catch the bus?' is a phrase they use."
Walton believes that what takes place on the forum "is a type of radicalisation into an extreme action that people otherwise might not even have considered." She is haunted by the possibility that the man who was with Aimee when she died was "living out a sick fantasy as an incel who wants to see a young and vulnerable woman end her life".
It's hard to believe that this is what "a lot of posts are basically saying". I go on here (unfortunately) multiple times a week and I never see comments like this, e.g., actively encouraging or pushing someone to do it. It's sad that people can just say this trite without pushback, but imagine if someone went on the news and 'defended' the website? They'd be "pro wanting young people to kill themselves" and would be socially scorned. It's pathetic.
Who is saying "when are you going to CTB"? Who is pushing people to do it sooner? I don't see these posts and if they do exist then I hope whomever saying it is quickly banned.
As for the social dynamics of the forum-it is probably true that there is a level of 'normalisation' and knowledge sharing that makes suicide more likely, but if someone takes the effort to find SaSu then they're obviously already suicidal. It's not like you can just find it on a whim when googling puppies, is it? Don't be ridiculous. It's giving people a chance to kill themselves peacefully (relatively speaking) rather than using a more painful method. If its increasing suicide (which I think it may do slightly, but not significantly) then deal with the root causes (e.g., a broken mental health system, for starters) and not the symptoms. If she hadn't killed herself with SN because of information on here then she still would've been suffering immensely or would've attempted in some other way. I feel for her above all else because I'd rather she be happy than dead, but this just seems to disregard her actual issues as so many of these articles do.
Regarding her supposedly dying with a man (through the 'partners thread'?), I don't know if there's evidence that there was anything untoward about the man. I've not read the book and I'm not paying £20 for it obviously. I do think that it's a risky thing to do if you're a young woman and I wouldn't be surprised if there are real horror stories. Did he also die? I don't know. I think it should be made super clear on the forum that it's a very dangerous activity. Maybe more so than it is now.
Finally, regarding the incel stuff, I never got the idea that this is an incel forum. I am not an incel and loathe misogynistic cultures like that. There are a lot of women on here. If the owners are incels then fuck them, but this is evidently not an incel site nor have the admins ever pushed it in an incel direction (I think many would immediately leave if they did-quite rightly).
To link SaSu to incel culture and even extreme grooming communities like that Discord one that gets girls to self-harm (cannot remember the name) is nonsensical.
Walton's consideration of victims of online harms in her book ranges widely – from
Archie Battersbee
Yet another case where the grieving family member is unable to deal with the trauma and the feeling of responsibility/guilt so deflects it onto other things. No, there is 0 evidence of this "Tik Tok challenge", nor of the idea it's even physically possible to hold your breathe long enough to cause brain damage. He killed himself, I'm sorry, but he did.
Sad and bad article. The Channel4 coverage was even worse. I am thinking of Aimee Walton today.