Pluto
Meowing to go out
- Dec 27, 2020
- 4,031
The story goes something like this: there was a young man in Western Australia. Everything was going great for him. The sun was shining and the birds were singing. But then one sorrowful day, he randomly stumbled across an evil pro-suicide website full of murderous predators. Succumbing to the darkness, he was persuaded to take his own life using SN, and he promptly agreed to do so. Now, following his death, saintly activists are working around the clock to destroy the evil website that killed this poor young man and many others like him.
Dear ABC, this is a new low for yellow journalism. Here are just some of the key points you somehow missed:
* There is an enormous difference between pro-choice and pro-suicide. Pro-choice accepts the reality that there are extreme cases of chronic pain, severe mental illness and grave trauma when all society's usual strategies of locking people up, pumping them full of drugs and telling them to think happy thoughts fail. Desperate people are forced to take matters into their own hands because of our stone-age euthanasia laws and dismissive attitude to suicidal ideation.
* Information about suicide methods is readily available, even on Wikipedia. This is a forum allowing people in dire situations to feel understood and supported with whatever choice they must make. It is a necessity only because medical experts are clearly not competent in dealing with these extreme cases, nor does society allow for open discussion of end-of-life bodily autonomy. After all, everyone should live to 100 regardless of absurdly low quality of life, ne-c'est pas?. It's not like we're dogs who are allowed euthanasia to avoid a life of suffering.
* Long-term suicidal people such as myself are perfectly capable of rational cognition and sensible appraisals of our own situations. We are not farm animals to be herded back to the pen of the psych ward.
* While it is appropriate to have safeguards in place to prevent suicides involving young or healthy people in momentary distress, for people suffering with chronic pain and other intolerable life situations, peaceful suicide methods are vastly preferable to jumping in front of trains, or other barbaric acts that desperate people might resort to.
* All internet searches regarding suicide are bombarded with common mental health help websites like Beyond Blue. Finding a pro-choice website requires a far more meticulous search, which generally only an individual in an advanced stage of suicidal ideation will do.
* Many people have recovered as a direct result of time here, due to the rare environment of nonjudgmental understanding and compassion.
* For Christ's sake, people do not kill themselves for no reason. Every single case involves family abuse, trauma, chronic pain, mental illness, etc. Almost no information was given about your young man case-study's actual backstory. It is an insult to his memory to use a misinformed simplification of his tragic end to dramatise your short-sighted article, knowing he has no way of defending himself to set the record straight.
* This very same publication has published articles on the topic of voluntary euthanasia, and somehow it is OK to talk about it when it's in a political context.
* Over 3,000 Australians commit suicide each year. The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of 3,000 is a statistic, right?
I am pretty sure I am the most prolific Australian poster on here, and I sometimes spend half my day trying to help young people gain clarity and hopefully be steered towards recovery. The reason it is so hard is because people here are already in an advanced stage of suicidal ideation, as I am myself. This situation should be prevented far earlier on by engaged parents (with all due respect and compassion to those who are grieving), well-resourced schools and competent medical professionals. Not to mention making the world a much better place in general.
What to say except that I envy people like the writer of this article who obviously enjoys a sheltered life. Hopefully it stays that way, otherwise she will be clamoring for the comfort of peaceful end-of-life methods just like the many members of this community who find ourselves trapped in less than privileged and workable situations.
Dear ABC, this is a new low for yellow journalism. Here are just some of the key points you somehow missed:
* There is an enormous difference between pro-choice and pro-suicide. Pro-choice accepts the reality that there are extreme cases of chronic pain, severe mental illness and grave trauma when all society's usual strategies of locking people up, pumping them full of drugs and telling them to think happy thoughts fail. Desperate people are forced to take matters into their own hands because of our stone-age euthanasia laws and dismissive attitude to suicidal ideation.
* Information about suicide methods is readily available, even on Wikipedia. This is a forum allowing people in dire situations to feel understood and supported with whatever choice they must make. It is a necessity only because medical experts are clearly not competent in dealing with these extreme cases, nor does society allow for open discussion of end-of-life bodily autonomy. After all, everyone should live to 100 regardless of absurdly low quality of life, ne-c'est pas?. It's not like we're dogs who are allowed euthanasia to avoid a life of suffering.
* Long-term suicidal people such as myself are perfectly capable of rational cognition and sensible appraisals of our own situations. We are not farm animals to be herded back to the pen of the psych ward.
* While it is appropriate to have safeguards in place to prevent suicides involving young or healthy people in momentary distress, for people suffering with chronic pain and other intolerable life situations, peaceful suicide methods are vastly preferable to jumping in front of trains, or other barbaric acts that desperate people might resort to.
* All internet searches regarding suicide are bombarded with common mental health help websites like Beyond Blue. Finding a pro-choice website requires a far more meticulous search, which generally only an individual in an advanced stage of suicidal ideation will do.
* Many people have recovered as a direct result of time here, due to the rare environment of nonjudgmental understanding and compassion.
* For Christ's sake, people do not kill themselves for no reason. Every single case involves family abuse, trauma, chronic pain, mental illness, etc. Almost no information was given about your young man case-study's actual backstory. It is an insult to his memory to use a misinformed simplification of his tragic end to dramatise your short-sighted article, knowing he has no way of defending himself to set the record straight.
* This very same publication has published articles on the topic of voluntary euthanasia, and somehow it is OK to talk about it when it's in a political context.
* Over 3,000 Australians commit suicide each year. The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of 3,000 is a statistic, right?
I am pretty sure I am the most prolific Australian poster on here, and I sometimes spend half my day trying to help young people gain clarity and hopefully be steered towards recovery. The reason it is so hard is because people here are already in an advanced stage of suicidal ideation, as I am myself. This situation should be prevented far earlier on by engaged parents (with all due respect and compassion to those who are grieving), well-resourced schools and competent medical professionals. Not to mention making the world a much better place in general.
What to say except that I envy people like the writer of this article who obviously enjoys a sheltered life. Hopefully it stays that way, otherwise she will be clamoring for the comfort of peaceful end-of-life methods just like the many members of this community who find ourselves trapped in less than privileged and workable situations.
Last edited: