Volatile
God
- Jun 18, 2018
- 1,286
I thought they were pro-choice.
Wtf. No it should be 18 or older. 18 yr olds can die for their country, so they should be allowed to be euthanized tooThey have in the ultra liberal countries like Belgium, Holland etc. I think. The talk about suicide right now in the West is generally focused around teens and euthanasia of the elderly.
I think they should make a 25yr age minimum and a 1 year deferral process when applying, with a series of interviews etc. It should be strict for those who truly want to die, in peace and who are steadfast in the idea of exiting just not in a horrific manor.
Wtf. No it should be 18 or older. 18 yr olds can die for their country, so they should be allowed to be euthanized too
21 and that's my final offer
. Supporting abortion and disagreeing that a human being is entitled to end their life, to me is just as logically inconsistent as being both pro-life and pro-death penality.
Lol well thankfully i'll still be eligible.After some thought, i'm pushing the age limit up to 28
Democrats have been shown to use dead people to vote for them, so if anything they should support euthanasia. More posthumous votes for them lolI have always wondered about this as well. If you take the argument that life is a gift from God and should be protected, then you can't rationally argue that humans can take away someone's gift from God. For those raised in / associated with the Evangelical church, it's like saying that God gives Grace and redemption, but human beings can decide when to revoke someone else's Grace and redemption based on their actions. The latter would be an anathema in practically every evangelical church I've ever been in.
At least I understand (but don't identify with) the approved Catholic stance: pro-life is pro-life, whether that's infants or convicts. They're consistent at least on paper (so far as I know).
I would wager that Liberals in general don't push suicide / euthanasia because the liberal political parties don't have much to gain. At best, they people who may or may not be around long to vote for them the following season. Additionally, it would backfire in that many family / friends would blame the party for those laws being passed. Always follow the money / votes / power. Although you probably won't like where it ends up.
Most people cannot fathom wanting to actually die. Hence, it is assumed that anyone suicidal cannot be in their right mind.
Because "liberal" in the US is center-right in the civilized world, that's why. The best most of them can be called is neoliberal, which is a nice way of saying "economic right-wing Mammon worshiper who thinks that maybe gays don't deserve to die," contrasted with neoconservative which is "economic loonie-bin right Mammon worshiper who thinks RJ Rushdoony is essentially the second coming."
The US has virtually no actual leftist presence, especially not comapred to the actual first world.
Ever considered that suicidal ideation might actually be more common than you assume, but most people will actually recover from it or learn to live with recurring thoughts like that?Most people cannot fathom wanting to actually die. Hence, it is assumed that anyone suicidal cannot be in their right mind.
I suspect that might actually be higher. Depression is much more common and I would assume suicidal ideation is rather common for depressed people at least at some points.3.7% is a mega minority. Hardly much.
In general I find the left far more open to euthanasia and such, but that's not to say I support either side (both are wrong a lot of the time imo).
I think it has more to do with virtue signaling than political ideology though. People want to feel good about themselves. They want to feel like they can make a difference or save a life. But on the whole I feel like who cares whether it's endorsed or not. It's hard to care about approval when you're dead.
Ever considered