N
noname223
Archangel
- Aug 18, 2020
- 5,001
I am kind of scared that if I make jokes about this topic the media will write "evil death cult members now want that everyone on earth dies". This is not my intention. But if a nuclear war would mean a fast and painless death I would take that suicide method. Instead of provoking death by cop, death by provoking a nuclear war. (Don't judge me I am coping with dark humor. Though it is not really funny.)
Yeah obviously I have no influence on it so it my stance does not really matter. If such a nuclear war would happen the people who survive the first nukes would probably be in an apocalyptic scenario fighting over the last remaining resources. I have read many would probably starve and I probably would not get my medication anymore.
I think personally I hope that I would die very fast. I once read Germany would be a good place for the first atomic bomb because it is in the heart of Europe. Ukraine is not that far away. I think intercontinental nuclear weapons are easier to be anticipated. There is technology that can shoot the bomb before it reaches its target. So the strike can be prevented. This is the reason why a target in a higher distant is harder to hit. At least this is what I believe to have read some time ago. I think I read it in the context of North Korea and Seoul as target for a atomic strike.
Moreover I think my country does not really have the best protection system against nuclear weapons. At least this is what I suppose. The USA have a way higher military budget.
Which country do you think would be first hit?
Yeah obviously I have no influence on it so it my stance does not really matter. If such a nuclear war would happen the people who survive the first nukes would probably be in an apocalyptic scenario fighting over the last remaining resources. I have read many would probably starve and I probably would not get my medication anymore.
I think personally I hope that I would die very fast. I once read Germany would be a good place for the first atomic bomb because it is in the heart of Europe. Ukraine is not that far away. I think intercontinental nuclear weapons are easier to be anticipated. There is technology that can shoot the bomb before it reaches its target. So the strike can be prevented. This is the reason why a target in a higher distant is harder to hit. At least this is what I believe to have read some time ago. I think I read it in the context of North Korea and Seoul as target for a atomic strike.
Moreover I think my country does not really have the best protection system against nuclear weapons. At least this is what I suppose. The USA have a way higher military budget.
Which country do you think would be first hit?
Last edited: