C
Circles
Visionary
- Sep 3, 2018
- 2,297
For me I'd choose no reason but I can't explain why at the moment especially since my eye problems won't allow more time to explain.
For me I'd choose no reason but I can't explain why at the moment especially since my eye problems won't allow more time to explain.
Again either there's a reason for why suffering exists at all or doesn't and it's completely random process unless there's an unknown third option that indescribable to us humans to understand. But I get what you're saying. Maybe also given an infinite amount of universes you get an infinite amount of chances of levels of suffering.The worst thing is that the possibility of suffering exists at all.
"Hat man sein warum? des Lebens, so verträgt man sich fast mit jedem wie?"If there was a reason there would exist a possibility of reaping certain benefits. A reason for suffering is the reason to endure the suffering.
"Det er ganske sandt, hvad Philosophien siger, at Livet maa forstaaes baglænds. Men derover glemmer man den anden Sætning, at det maa leves forlænds."I wonder, is it really possible to assign reason (or not) to suffering in any other way but retroactively?