BoulderSoWhat
Student
- Aug 29, 2024
- 161
What do you think?
Imagine, somehow, you were consulted before becoming an existent being, about whether you wanted to exist. This is meant to consider "existence" very broadly. I certainly have no idea wtf the universe is, if there's multiverses, multiple multiverses, or other incomprehensible structures beyond what we've been able to figure out so far in cosmology and physics.
Given any structure of existing, being human or something else, if you were consulted about whether or not you'd like to exist in some way and were able to rationally consider pros or cons, would this quasi-existent consultant "state of being" still include suffering in some degree?
Very broadly, I'm just going to pull this stat for consideration: "Around 6 million children under 15 die per year. That's around 16,000 deaths every day, or 11 every minute."
So in the case of being consulted about whether or not you would like to exist in a world where this is a fact, to make a rational choice about assessing the pros and cons of dying, maybe in a horrific unspeakable way without hardly having even started being alive, this "pre-existent mind" would need to accurately know what it is to live, die, and suffer as an existent life form. Assuming "knowing what it's like" works in some way similar to how we have mirror neurons to feel, sympathize, or empathize with what another person is going through, would this still be a form of suffering? To be able to consider, understand, and reject "actually existing" because you acutely know what that experience is going to be like, or could be like, would be "better" than just beginning to exist without choice, but would this state still not be "good" to experience? Would being consulted at all before being born still be something you would rather not experience? It just pushes back the predicament right? You weren't consulted about whether you wanted to be a "pre-existent thing" that could be consulted about "actually existing."
Well okay but what if you were a "pre-pre-existent thing..." Yeah no, the problem just goes on ad infinitum. :(
Let me know if any of this makes remotely some sense. If not I'll just be quiet lol.
Imagine, somehow, you were consulted before becoming an existent being, about whether you wanted to exist. This is meant to consider "existence" very broadly. I certainly have no idea wtf the universe is, if there's multiverses, multiple multiverses, or other incomprehensible structures beyond what we've been able to figure out so far in cosmology and physics.
Given any structure of existing, being human or something else, if you were consulted about whether or not you'd like to exist in some way and were able to rationally consider pros or cons, would this quasi-existent consultant "state of being" still include suffering in some degree?
Very broadly, I'm just going to pull this stat for consideration: "Around 6 million children under 15 die per year. That's around 16,000 deaths every day, or 11 every minute."
Child and Infant Mortality
Child mortality remains one of the world’s largest problems and is a painful reminder of work yet to be done. With global data on where, when, and how child deaths occur, we can accelerate efforts to prevent them.
ourworldindata.org
So in the case of being consulted about whether or not you would like to exist in a world where this is a fact, to make a rational choice about assessing the pros and cons of dying, maybe in a horrific unspeakable way without hardly having even started being alive, this "pre-existent mind" would need to accurately know what it is to live, die, and suffer as an existent life form. Assuming "knowing what it's like" works in some way similar to how we have mirror neurons to feel, sympathize, or empathize with what another person is going through, would this still be a form of suffering? To be able to consider, understand, and reject "actually existing" because you acutely know what that experience is going to be like, or could be like, would be "better" than just beginning to exist without choice, but would this state still not be "good" to experience? Would being consulted at all before being born still be something you would rather not experience? It just pushes back the predicament right? You weren't consulted about whether you wanted to be a "pre-existent thing" that could be consulted about "actually existing."
Well okay but what if you were a "pre-pre-existent thing..." Yeah no, the problem just goes on ad infinitum. :(
Let me know if any of this makes remotely some sense. If not I'll just be quiet lol.