So, what I'm gathering, and correct me if I am wrong, it's fine to use and do certain things (whether it's drugs, drinking, gaming, porn, whatever) as long as it's not causing any problems? Okay, but what exactly are "problems?"
First of this is just my personal opinion.
Most generally my opinion is that it's your body so it shouldn't be criticised for what you do with it.
But since this isn't about other people but about helping each other I rather share my thoughts concerning myself, e.g. what I would do for myself, perhaps this different viewpoint can help you or others who read it.
As long as it's not causing any problem, rationally speaking, why
would you not take them?
If caffeine helps you get up in the moning and doesn't affect your cardiovascular system negatively, then why not drink coffee?
If you like gambling, given that you have enough money to spare and it's not causing financial problems for you, then where's the harm, people spend money on their hobbies, in which way is that different from a hobby in that scenario?
Personally I don't like alcohol or any other substances that affect the way I think or feel, so to me, consuming them would be a problem, so getting addicted on them would be bad for me.
But things might be different for other people (sure not about alcohol or other harmful substances but generally speaking).
In your specific case, concerning alcohol and THC, I'd start by trying to understand the effects of those substances, both the immediate and long term effects that might come occour as a result of physical addiction.
In the case of alcohol it's pretty well understood that it's harmful to our physical health, in case of THC I think it's less well understood.
I'd probably go to a doctor that knows about the specific workings of THC, additionally to researching on my own, to try to understand in which ways THC affects my body and mind.
If you know those things you can make an informed decision and pick whatever path is best for yourself.
Weighing the pros and cons against each other, a totally fictional example would be:
Say the drug I'm taking helps me focus on my work and without it I'm having a hard time doing tasks correctly.
It doesn't have any negative physiological effects and also mentally I don't feel negatively affected (f.e. feeling emotionless, anxious, numb, etc), but it does make me sleepy and as a result I can't drive in that state.
In that case I'd see how much this sleepiness affects my life negatively and compare that to how much my concentration issues affect my life.
I'd see if I can somehow find different ways to deal with my concentration issues such changing up the structure of my tasks so I'm able to complete them anyway.
Alternatively it might be possible to mitigate the sleepiness by having a better sleep routine.
If the concentration issues pose a larger problem than the sleepiness, then wouldn't it be the logical choice to pick the lesser evil?
I could argue that a gaming or porn addiction (and I will use addiction and dependence interchangeably) doesn't actively cause problems if it's moderate, but when you want to cut down on it but find you're unable to do so, well then I think that it then becomes one doesn't it?
Yea I agree, and this is the point why I said that I'm having a hard time relating to addiction personally.
Because for me, wanting (like actually wanting) to stop would mean that I will stop.
If I'm not coerced by some other factor (such as withdrawal symptoms in physical dependence) then what's stopping me from reducing that?
F.e. if I may want to try out swimming as a hobby but I spend all my free time gaming so I don't have time for that.
First of, I wouldn't call that an addiction, but if I really want to go swimming,... then I'd just do that?
Like that's the part I don't get,.. if I want to go swimming over gaming then obviously I'd go swimming, if I actually prefer gaming over swimming then I wouldn't go swimming but in that case I wouldn't want to reduce gaming so I can make time for swimming, if that makes sense.
That's the part I don't understand about psychiological dependence.
Let's look at another example, say you're in an abusive relationship but have fallen victim to emotional abuse targeted to make you dependent on your partner.
You are psychological dependent and in that way "can't leave" because you don't
want to leave, despite knowing that you should.
Thats what I would define psychological dependence as.
It's less an "I want to leave but I can't" but rather an "I know I should leave and it would be better for myself but the thought alone frightens me so much I don't want to".
On the other hand a lot of people even in healthy relationships become reliant or dependent on their partner in some way, but in that case there is no psychiological dependence since there is no reason to leave, after all, why would you want to leave when you are in a good relationship?
So looking at that I'd say if your what you call "addiction" doesn't cause any problems and it's "moderate", then it's not an addiction.
It becomes an addiction if you think you should stop it or are even trying to find a way, but ultimately fail because you personally don't actually want to stop it, you just think you should.
And I think the key to getting out of those addictions is to be able to make the jump from "I think I should" to "I actually want to".
Because if you want to stop it,.. then you can, nothing is stopping you after all.
Yeah, you're not getting withdrawals or any physical symptoms, but you want to limit yourself but find that you can't.
Why would you though?
Just for the sake of it?
If there are reasons that you want to limit yourself then I think you can if those reasons are more important then the thing you want to limit yourself at.
F.e. If I just think doing more workouts would be good for me but don't actually want to do any, then obviously I won't be able to do them.
We don't do things simply by thinking we should, we do things because we believe that they are important, that they have a positive effect on our lives.
People do work out because they believe it will have a positive effect on their health, so they feel better doing them than not doing them and it only makes sense to do the thing that results in the better outcome for yourself.
There are a lot of psychological aspects that go into it but I don't want to write an essay right now and be a cringelord that pulls out studies. In a nutshell: You may feel depressed or angry with yourself that you can't stop/moderate which damages your mental health, which in my mind is a problem. This is what's going on with me.
As you said, if it damages your mental (or physical) health it is a problem.
More simply, if you think of it as a problem it's a problem.
And that's again what I said I have trouble understanding.
If you see it as a problem isn't that enough motivation for you to stop then?
Though perhaps the negative effect it has on your mental health is less than the positive effect it has?
That would be the only way I could wrap my head around it,.. if lets say it solved one problem, e.g. helps with sleeping, but caused another, e.g. idk causes headaches, then perhaps you don't stop it because you perceive the positive effect it has as more significant than the negative effect it has?
In which case I again think that thorouly informing yourself and exploring those positive and negative effects in depth will allow you to make an decision which you can actually follow through on.
I am not directly being affected by all the crap that I've been doing but I would like to not do that stuff.
Then firstly I'd adk myself
why I would like to not to that stuff.
Sorry if this isn't very helpful.. This is just what I'd do in this situation but I'm probably pretty different from other people in that regard so it might not be the most natural thing for others.
To paint a better picture since I am sometimes not the best at explaining things, I'll use myself as an anecdotal example except I will use soda and porn as opposed to alcohol and THC. Soda is generally fine (minus that it's messing up my teeth), and porn here and there is also fine. I'm not spending hours on porn or drinking 5 liters of soda per day. The thing is though - I want to stop watching porn, and I want to at the very least moderate drinking soda. I have extreme difficulty in doing both. Does wanting to stop or moderate something but being unable to do so not constitute a problem?
As I said I think it's a problem (for yourself) if you think it is.
Like yeah, I'm not "that bad" compared to some people but I still view it as a problem. It isn't directly impacting me in ways I can see, but what about the impacts I'm not able to see?
That's why imo thoroughly informing yourself about the things you consume is important.
If you know which specific problems it's causing or not causing you can make a better decision.
What if I simply want to stop for the sake of it but can't?
That is a very good question, and precisely the part I can't relate to at all.
If I can't then there is a reason for why I can't.
I can't think of anything that I wasn't able to stop when I wanted to, but I also can't think of anything I wanted to stop just for the sake of it.
For me it really is just as simple as "If there's a reason to take it, I take it, if there's a reason not to then I don't".
So first of I'd again try to understand my own motivations and feelings towards that matter, why do I want to stop, what do I gain from that?
Why can't I stop, what's preventing me?
You said you didn't want to write an essay, well I guess I did, sorry about that :P