ImSorryEmma
Skylar
- Mar 28, 2019
- 107
The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the appeal of Michelle Carter, the Massachusetts woman convicted of manslaughter in connection with her boyfriend's 2014 suicide.
A state court said that Carter engaged in a "systematic campaign of coercion" that culminated in Conrad Roy's suicide. Carter counters that the contested speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Carter's conviction set off a nationwide debate over the applicability of free speech principles to a rampant crisis of cyberbullying.
Original Article:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/13/michelle-carter-supreme-court/
(the article goes into way more detail on the whole situation)
What do you guys think about this? Do you think the supreme court was justified for rejecting her appeal?
A state court said that Carter engaged in a "systematic campaign of coercion" that culminated in Conrad Roy's suicide. Carter counters that the contested speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Carter's conviction set off a nationwide debate over the applicability of free speech principles to a rampant crisis of cyberbullying.
Original Article:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/13/michelle-carter-supreme-court/
(the article goes into way more detail on the whole situation)
What do you guys think about this? Do you think the supreme court was justified for rejecting her appeal?