
Sprite_Geist
NULL
- May 27, 2020
- 1,596
One of the arguments against suicide is that it is selfish because it hurts loved ones or those that care about you to some extent - the bold word is key. This has repeatedly sparked the question lately: Why does a person who is suicidal have to be concerned about others that care about them? Yes this sounds cold, but please read on.
For example: You might really wish to be friends with another person; you find that you like them and perhaps even have some form of connection. Does this mean that they have to feel the same way about you? No. Just because Person A cares about Person B, it does not mean that Person B has to reciprocate. You want to be friends with someone, but you cannot make them be friends with you; you have a crush on someone but, similarly, you cannot make them want to love you in return. Everybody has a choice about whether or not to accept or decline another individuals offer of a relationship. If they decline then it is called rejection, and it is something that every person is permitted to do; after all it would be wrong to try and force somebody else to be in your life when they do not want to be.
So following this logic: If we are all allowed to reject each other, to choose who we do not want to have in our lives in the context of relationships, then surely a suicidal individual should be able to choose whether or not they want to reject those that care about them; just as in the same way that a potential crush could turn you down, or a potential friend can decide to block you online, or cut you off and ignore you in the real world. This means that somebody who is considering suicide does not have to consider those that care about them which, in turn, renders the argument that it is selfish toward others invalid
What do you think of this?
...And please bear in mind that I do not necessarily support what I have wrote - I think that we should try to be kind to each other in reality and care about other peoples welfare - hence my total opposition to bullying and such. The question that is posed above is more of a thought experiment in response to what I think is a double-standard in society.
For example: You might really wish to be friends with another person; you find that you like them and perhaps even have some form of connection. Does this mean that they have to feel the same way about you? No. Just because Person A cares about Person B, it does not mean that Person B has to reciprocate. You want to be friends with someone, but you cannot make them be friends with you; you have a crush on someone but, similarly, you cannot make them want to love you in return. Everybody has a choice about whether or not to accept or decline another individuals offer of a relationship. If they decline then it is called rejection, and it is something that every person is permitted to do; after all it would be wrong to try and force somebody else to be in your life when they do not want to be.
So following this logic: If we are all allowed to reject each other, to choose who we do not want to have in our lives in the context of relationships, then surely a suicidal individual should be able to choose whether or not they want to reject those that care about them; just as in the same way that a potential crush could turn you down, or a potential friend can decide to block you online, or cut you off and ignore you in the real world. This means that somebody who is considering suicide does not have to consider those that care about them which, in turn, renders the argument that it is selfish toward others invalid
What do you think of this?
...And please bear in mind that I do not necessarily support what I have wrote - I think that we should try to be kind to each other in reality and care about other peoples welfare - hence my total opposition to bullying and such. The question that is posed above is more of a thought experiment in response to what I think is a double-standard in society.
Last edited: