TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,813
A few months ago, I had a discussion with someone online about the idea of suicide being rational and even after taking out religion and subjective secular morality, he told me that most people (including himself) are against it due to the issue of the act being final, being permanent. I've argued that humans have oftenly made shitty choices such as eating unhealthily, doing risky/extreme activities (skydiving, base jumping, racing, eating dangerous foods that could kill if prepared improperly, visit dangerous locations, etc.), smoking, doing drugs, etc. However, he has argued that those activities that are harmful are oftenly temporary and mostly can be recovered from. He did however, partially agree that if someone was suffering immensely for an extended period of time (years - like over a decade or so), including mentally/psychologically, then he would agree with said person's decision to die.
What are your thoughts on his stance? What good counter-arguments are there to his point?
Note: This is similar to the line of "Suicide is a permanent problem to a temporary problem" but not quite the same line of reasoning.
What are your thoughts on his stance? What good counter-arguments are there to his point?
Note: This is similar to the line of "Suicide is a permanent problem to a temporary problem" but not quite the same line of reasoning.