enjoy
Creature
- Dec 20, 2019
- 337
it's crazy how they outnumber us sometimes. anyone else feel like they're part of a zoo exhibit? are we really this popular?!
I was thinking the same thing yesterday when I saw there were nearly 500 guests..it's crazy how they outnumber us sometimes. anyone else feel like they're part of a zoo exhibit? are we really this popular?!
I confess, I wondered if the suicide sub should be separated off and closed to non members and to new members until they've gone through a trial period. This would especially apply to the partners thread too. But I don't know. That would have the effect of almost 'proofing' people, not just if they are genuine but also if their intent is solid - give them support for a period before hand to make sure they understand the implications of accessing certain material, to try and prevent impulsive behaviour. On the other hand that could stop people in dangerous circumstances accessing the support they need. There are advantages and disadvantages and (as usual, sorry) I'm not entirely certain how I feel about the idea. And ofc there is the argument that people have the right to do whatever they please and its no-one's prerogative to censor that.In addition, I think there are many people who find solace in reading threads about suicide and recovery here, but choose to die by their own hand without ever joining and without any witnesses.
I can fully understand why the suicide and recovery subforums are open for everyone to read, because that may obviously help many people, but maybe there should be subforums for venting/support and off-topic stuff respectively which are for members only.
I was just like that -- I was about to ctb , my research was complete , I've been lurking (guest) for few good months . I registered just to say thank you lol .In addition, I think there are many people who find solace in reading threads about suicide and recovery here, but choose to die by their own hand without ever joining and without any witnesses.
Someone suggested "Methods" sub-forum , so that suicide discussion will be separated from technical information . It's a good idea also to prevent pollution of suicide threads by new members asking not-so-smart questions . It kinda does not work , like they go hand in hand ?I confess, I wondered if the suicide sub should be separated off and closed to non members and to new members until they've gone through a trial period.
Unfortunately, if methods are closed for lurkers and new members, PePH will be still easy to find. Also, there are lots of other websites where such an information is in abundance. We are trying to make methods as safe and peaceful as possible, some websites do not care about that and eventually such reads may just ruin somebody's life. So it is just a flip-side of a coin.Someone suggested "Methods" sub-forum , so that suicide discussion will be separated from technical information . It's a good idea also to prevent pollution of suicide threads by new members asking not-so-smart questions . It kinda does not work , like they go hand in hand ?
And yeah much support comes from the main suicide forum . A trial period could make little difference -- a new member would just wait a week . But these ideas are good start that could/should be improved .
~
However , this kinds of thread should be closed for public and new members (I don't know how) :
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/sodium-nitrite-in-europe.32008/
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/us-based-looking-for-meto.31968/
etc
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_hanging Like thisSomeone suggested "Methods" sub-forum , so that suicide discussion will be separated from technical information . It's a good idea also to prevent pollution of suicide threads by new members asking not-so-smart questions . It kinda does not work , like they go hand in hand ?
And yeah much support comes from the main suicide forum . A trial period could make little difference -- a new member would just wait a week . But these ideas are good start that could/should be improved .
~
However , this kinds of thread should be closed for public and new members (I don't know how) :
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/sodium-nitrite-in-europe.32008/
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/us-based-looking-for-meto.31968/
etc
Very good points . The original idea was not about hiding methods but making order in threads . I guess because we can't separate ctb from ctb methods , and we want to make methods discussion public (thus smarter and safer) , it's not really practical .Unfortunately, if methods are closed for lurkers and new members, PePH will be still easy to find. Also, there are lots of other websites where such an information is in abundance. We are trying to make methods as safe and peaceful as possible, some websites do not care about that and eventually such reads may just ruin somebody's life. So it is just a flip-side of a coin.
Edit: even Wikipedia teaches us to CTB
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_hanging Like this
Hi! What documentary?Yes its bound to increase after the documentary this week.
I lurked for a few days before signing up, I knew I had found my new 'family'
❤
There was a programme on UK tv this week about the failure of the NHS mental health services, leading to the suicide of a young girl who had accessed 'suicide forums'Hi! What documentary?
gotcha.There was a programme on UK tv this week about the failure of the NHS mental health services, leading to the suicide of a young girl who had accessed 'suicide forums'
I think Samaritans can help if people are impulsive, but if you just google SS, you will get Helpline first. So I think it could be a separate thread created with numbers in case of emergency. Samaritans are not working good for us, long-years suicidal people, but despite negative reports can be good for a certain group of people.Very good points . The original idea was not about hiding methods but making order in threads . I guess because we can't separate ctb from ctb methods , and we want to make methods discussion public (thus smarter and safer) , it's not really practical .
Perhaps a better approach , instead of Samaritans notice that was removed there should be short introduction (pro choice) , basic rules (no encouragement suppliers ) , redirection to recovery forum , and link emphasizing resource page .
I think "Where can I get X" could be a pinned post (like partners megathread) . It's really annoying . It's polluting . It's bad for brand . It's bad for suppliers .
Sorry this has turned into a technical post (feedback forum) and I've digressed from original subject (blame Underscode!;) -- new guests and members are coming , how we feel about it .
You may stop a suicide by gifting your cooking! It is never good to CTB on full stomach!They know I am here, they heard how bad my cooking is, can't believe it, and want to see for themselves
I think most people lurked before joining so some of them will be genuine. But yeah, some will be LEOs or media or whatever.
Scary thing is some of them might be both.
It depends. If the majority of the influx of new members are pro-lifers or proselytizers then it could cause disruption and uneasiness in a forum already full of vulnerable people, which is bad. However, if it brings new SS members that are pro-choice and respect each others' views and what not, then it would be good.Every time we have a publicized suicide or a goodbye thread the numbers spike. Sometimes I feel like we're not just being watched but studied. But usually we get a influx of new members right after. Idk if that's a good or bad thing.
yeah like I say there's no easy answer hereSomeone suggested "Methods" sub-forum , so that suicide discussion will be separated from technical information . It's a good idea also to prevent pollution of suicide threads by new members asking not-so-smart questions . It kinda does not work , like they go hand in hand ?
And yeah much support comes from the main suicide forum . A trial period could make little difference -- a member would just wait a week . But these ideas are good start that could/should be improved .
Noooo word salad is fine, it's great, i suffer from that all the time! I know what you mean, I do the 'type it out then delete it all' too. Then I post anyway.I've lurked here and the previous sub iterations and migrations for years, and even still I lurk more than interact.
Most of the time I'll type out my thoughts, hit delete, then just complete discard my thoughts and instead end up liking a bunch of other members' posts while lurking.
It's just often a back and forth of being at a loss for words or being overwhelmed with words and not wanting to bother others with word salad.
430 guests againI was thinking the same thing yesterday when I saw there were nearly 500 guests..
Guests who stay as guests do miss out on the connections you make with real people who feel the same way you do though, and that's such a valuable thing about this place.The guests are the smart ones if anything. There's more then enough information that can be gleaned without signing up.
Becoming a member just exposes you to more risk really. I would've stayed a guest but I'm way past the point of caring anymore.
That's of course very true. But as mentioned above if they're just gathering information on methods it's not necessary to sign up. The information is widespread across the net.Guests who stay as guests do miss out on the connections you make with real people who feel the same way you do though, and that's such a valuable thing about this place.
That's the thing, they don't have to join to disrupt anything. The LEO's (@Underscore I like that term and I'm using it) put out their message almost anywhere while we only have this place to come for support. People who come to stir up trouble won't last long.It depends. If the majority of the influx of new members are pro-lifers or proselytizers then it could cause disruption and uneasiness in a forum already full of vulnerable people, which is bad. However, if it brings new SS members that are pro-choice and respect each others' views and what not, then it would be good.
Some interesting ideas on this thread.
I can attest to what I imagine are a few of the guests, though. I did genuinely lurk for a very long time - at least 8 months or so before joining. There may be a fair few who are like me amongst those guests.