charaunderground
* Let justice be done.
- Nov 29, 2024
- 138
This is something I've been thinking of for awhile.
I do understand being pro life in the case of, say, a normally mentally healthy person who has a great life and loves it becomes briefly suicidal because of acute stress that will soon pass, or it's a young teenager doing it on impulse because of something that they won't remember and won't matter by the next year. That's not what this is about.
I'm talking about people who think any and all suicides are "evil" or bad or on impulse. Who will do absolutely anything to stop it.
It's like how, if someone is self harming and has been long term, just taking their tool isn't going to stop them. It's just going to make them continue but use something potentially more dangerous (like a clean knife -> broken glass that could cause infection). It's not "curing" or stopping anything. It's arguably making the situation even worse. But you'll still have people who do these things patting themselves on the back that they "cured" their loved one's self harm because of it.
Taking away more "peaceful" suicide methods will only make people resort to more dangerous, painful, or traumatizing acts. Hearing of suppliers getting arrested with their buyer lists being investigated may spur someone who was going to wait awhile to CTB into immediate action out of panic. None of the typical pro life actions you hear about actually prevent anything if someone is motivated enough.
Even if you forcibly institutionalize someone over being suicidal, it's not like most psych hospitals are a big help. Trust me, I work in one (albeit in the forensics sections, not the "normal" floors) — I'd know. Even if workers genuinely want to be helpful, for most people, forced hospitalization is already traumatizing, and will only make people try harder the next time they attempt.
It just doesn't make sense. They're so worried about taking down their boogeyman of the week (SN, N, whatever) that they don't consider any consequences of it. Sure, you might prevent some suicides. But how many of those people, who were going to use something peaceful, might now cause themself slow and painful deaths or just throw themself in front of trains instead of using what they planned on?
I do understand being pro life in the case of, say, a normally mentally healthy person who has a great life and loves it becomes briefly suicidal because of acute stress that will soon pass, or it's a young teenager doing it on impulse because of something that they won't remember and won't matter by the next year. That's not what this is about.
I'm talking about people who think any and all suicides are "evil" or bad or on impulse. Who will do absolutely anything to stop it.
It's like how, if someone is self harming and has been long term, just taking their tool isn't going to stop them. It's just going to make them continue but use something potentially more dangerous (like a clean knife -> broken glass that could cause infection). It's not "curing" or stopping anything. It's arguably making the situation even worse. But you'll still have people who do these things patting themselves on the back that they "cured" their loved one's self harm because of it.
Taking away more "peaceful" suicide methods will only make people resort to more dangerous, painful, or traumatizing acts. Hearing of suppliers getting arrested with their buyer lists being investigated may spur someone who was going to wait awhile to CTB into immediate action out of panic. None of the typical pro life actions you hear about actually prevent anything if someone is motivated enough.
Even if you forcibly institutionalize someone over being suicidal, it's not like most psych hospitals are a big help. Trust me, I work in one (albeit in the forensics sections, not the "normal" floors) — I'd know. Even if workers genuinely want to be helpful, for most people, forced hospitalization is already traumatizing, and will only make people try harder the next time they attempt.
It just doesn't make sense. They're so worried about taking down their boogeyman of the week (SN, N, whatever) that they don't consider any consequences of it. Sure, you might prevent some suicides. But how many of those people, who were going to use something peaceful, might now cause themself slow and painful deaths or just throw themself in front of trains instead of using what they planned on?