N
noaccount
Enlightened
- Oct 26, 2019
- 1,099
So right now I am not trying to end my life, but I don't think I'm trying to 'recover' because I don't think my feelings of need-it-to-stop are a 'sickness'. So I'm hashing out how I'm navigating the balance of this.
My first thing is, I try to get real clear on what ethics / value judgements I'm thinking of myself as 'better' or 'worse' based on.
In one simple way, I can appreciate feeling 'better' ie happier sometimes, but I keep in mind, when I feel 'worse' ie in more pain:
I HAVE FEELINGS ABOUT PROBLEMS, MY FEELINGS THEMSELVES ARE NOT THE PROBLEMS.
Big key point is that officials like to say people kill themselves 'while the balance of their minds are disturbed,' and more well-off people like to say that people are in despair because of wrong-thinking, and if they were thinking more accurately they would see that they were somehow delusional about the things that were hurting them. And this is bullshit. Whether it's poverty, chronic illness, religious abuse, whatever - I want everyone to be believed about what's destroying them, and not be told that their thinking is more correct when it minimizes or brushes-over sources of pain.
This is the next thing, what ways of thinking and acting are morally better or worse? I think we have an intuitive sense that it's not ethically worse to be in more pain, but it is ethically worse to cause other people more pain. This feels very healthy, natural, but people with power have all kinds of ways to romanticize bullying, or romanticize letting it happen to you - the whole economy - "You need to be more productive at the cost of your health to be a good citizen! Me getting rich off you just makes me an entrepeneur/innovator!" So it's a big step to consciously say that there's no moral value to feeling more or less depressed.
I also ask myself, 'What might my suicidality liberate me to do differently?'
What risks might I take, that could kill me but could also be really good for me if I survive? That could be really good for other people whether or not I survive?
I'm thinking about my bucket list also - things I'd absolutely want to do before I died, that I'd feel a lot of resentment if I didn't get done.
The things that would let me feel at peace walking into mortal danger, though, are the same as what I'd want to feel I was living in a worthwhile way, like I was doing what some people call 'recovering.'
Even if I follow all the rules and stay as safe as I can I still don't have this body forever. Making decisions about when and how to let it go, is another part of what's life-affirming - I just don't want people to end their lives drowning in internalized oppression thinking things were their fault or that they're crazy for naming what's happening.
My first thing is, I try to get real clear on what ethics / value judgements I'm thinking of myself as 'better' or 'worse' based on.
In one simple way, I can appreciate feeling 'better' ie happier sometimes, but I keep in mind, when I feel 'worse' ie in more pain:
I HAVE FEELINGS ABOUT PROBLEMS, MY FEELINGS THEMSELVES ARE NOT THE PROBLEMS.
Big key point is that officials like to say people kill themselves 'while the balance of their minds are disturbed,' and more well-off people like to say that people are in despair because of wrong-thinking, and if they were thinking more accurately they would see that they were somehow delusional about the things that were hurting them. And this is bullshit. Whether it's poverty, chronic illness, religious abuse, whatever - I want everyone to be believed about what's destroying them, and not be told that their thinking is more correct when it minimizes or brushes-over sources of pain.
This is the next thing, what ways of thinking and acting are morally better or worse? I think we have an intuitive sense that it's not ethically worse to be in more pain, but it is ethically worse to cause other people more pain. This feels very healthy, natural, but people with power have all kinds of ways to romanticize bullying, or romanticize letting it happen to you - the whole economy - "You need to be more productive at the cost of your health to be a good citizen! Me getting rich off you just makes me an entrepeneur/innovator!" So it's a big step to consciously say that there's no moral value to feeling more or less depressed.
I also ask myself, 'What might my suicidality liberate me to do differently?'
What risks might I take, that could kill me but could also be really good for me if I survive? That could be really good for other people whether or not I survive?
I'm thinking about my bucket list also - things I'd absolutely want to do before I died, that I'd feel a lot of resentment if I didn't get done.
The things that would let me feel at peace walking into mortal danger, though, are the same as what I'd want to feel I was living in a worthwhile way, like I was doing what some people call 'recovering.'
Even if I follow all the rules and stay as safe as I can I still don't have this body forever. Making decisions about when and how to let it go, is another part of what's life-affirming - I just don't want people to end their lives drowning in internalized oppression thinking things were their fault or that they're crazy for naming what's happening.