N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
Let's think about this logically. You are only aware of yourself when you are sentient. You don't remember anything in a deep sleep or a dreamless sleep, you can only remember the moments before you go to sleep and when you wake up. You don't remember anything before the age of 1 or 2 years. So logically the same applies to death. You can never experience death, in the same way you never experience deep sleep or sleep. By definition there can't just be nothing, because you have to exist. Not existing is an impossible concept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim, Deutsch, Strumgewehr and 6 others
Caustic Cardinals

Caustic Cardinals

Enlightened
Sep 1, 2018
1,339
Let's think about this logically. You are only aware of yourself when you are sentient. You don't remember anything in a deep sleep or a dreamless sleep, you can only remember the moments before you go to sleep and when you wake up. You don't remember anything before the age of 1 or 2 years. So logically the same applies to death. You can never experience death, in the same way you never experience deep sleep or sleep. By definition there can't just be nothing, because you have to exist. Not existing is an impossible concept.


non existence sounds like bliss
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim, Deutsch, existenceissuffering and 2 others
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
Basically idealism.
No, you can never not exist because you can't know that you don't exist. It's a logical fallacy. I am not claiming the world is good, or that "you" will exist. There is no clear definition of what "you" are.
 
Caustic Cardinals

Caustic Cardinals

Enlightened
Sep 1, 2018
1,339
You can never not exist because you can't know that you don't exist. It's a logical fallacy.


Of course we can't perceive what it's like to not exist that's obvious but not existing is not incongruent with physical possibilities
 
  • Like
Reactions: lv-gras and existenceissuffering
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
Of course we can't perceive what it's like to not exist that's obvious but not existing is not incongruent with physical possibilities
You are missing the point. You do ever remember not being sentient? No, then by definition you need to be sentient to experience sentience. Although ego deaths, which I assume what you are referring to, are obviously the case in reality.
 
R

RacilyDank

Specialist
Sep 3, 2018
321
I've often thought about this. We desire death as relief from existence, but if we don't exist we won't feel the relief.

It's like when I die I won't even be aware of it so I'll never know if it worked. Bit of a headfuck really!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deutsch, lv-gras and bbq1
D

Deleted member 847

Guest
No, you can never not exist because you can't know that you don't exist. It's a logical fallacy. I am not claiming the world is good, or that "you" will exist. There is no clear definition of what "you" are.
I'd rather not waste my time with philosophical mumbo jumbo. "You" is the universe. You don't cease to exist, but you change your experience from being a conscious entity to being something else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regisphilbin_savant
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
Did anything exist before you were born?
I am not going to make the argument for solipsism, as it does not produce any results. Scientifically we can prove that things existed before I was born. There are a lot of reasons, and they should be really obvious, but I'll gladly explain them if you want me to. Also, we know science works because it produces predictive models of the universe, and evidence of that is that you're reading this comment on a device based on science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regisphilbin_savant
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
I'd rather not waste my time with philosophical mumbo jumbo. "You" is the universe. You don't cease to exist, but you change your experience from being a conscious entity to being something else.
How is you the universe? That is solipsism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regisphilbin_savant
D

Deleted member 847

Guest
I am not going to make the argument for solipsism, as it does not produce any results. Scientifically we can prove that things existed before I was born. There are a lot of reasons, and they should be really obvious, but I'll gladly explain them if you want me to. Also, we know science works because it produces predictive models of the universe, and evidence of that is that you're reading this comment on a device based on science.
I agree (?)
 
Caustic Cardinals

Caustic Cardinals

Enlightened
Sep 1, 2018
1,339
You are missing the point. You do ever remember not being sentient? No, then by definition you need to be sentient to experience sentience. Although ego deaths, which I assume what you are referring to, are obviously the case in reality.

like Dave's not home man.
 
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
Everything expanded from the Big Bang, therefore I am the Big Bang and so are you.
I agree, but the big bang is an event. I assume what you mean is that you are existence and so am I. And yes that is true.
 
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
Although I must point out that there is a very obvious flaw in this logic, and that is that if sentience must eventually exist, there exists infinity. We don't know for a fact infinity exists.
 
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
sorry misquote

"Dave's not here man"
Are you talking about the comedy sketch by cheech and chong? I just listened to it and don't understand what this has to do with anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caustic Cardinals
Caustic Cardinals

Caustic Cardinals

Enlightened
Sep 1, 2018
1,339
Are you talking about the comedy sketch by cheech and chong? I just listened to it and don't understand what this has to do with anything.

and there you have it
 
  • Like
Reactions: RM5998
RM5998

RM5998

Sack of Meat
Sep 3, 2018
2,202
What do you mean?

According to current formulations of general relativity, the observable and predictable part of the universe temporally extends back to 13.6 billion years ago. This doesn't mean that there was nothing before 13.6 billion years ago - rather, that the current formulation of physics breaks down at that point. Everything that came before 13.6 billion years ago cannot affect what came after the point we call the Big Bang - but this doesn't necessarily mean that there was nothing there.

Sorry about that tangent. It's a pet peeve of mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ningaman151
D

Deleted member 847

Guest
According to current formulations of general relativity, the observable and predictable part of the universe temporally extends back to 13.6 billion years ago. This doesn't mean that there was nothing before 13.6 billion years ago - rather, that the current formulation of physics breaks down at that point. Everything that came before 13.6 billion years ago cannot affect what came after the point we call the Big Bang - but this doesn't necessarily mean that there was nothing there.

Sorry about that tangent. It's a pet peeve of mine.

There was an eternal something that lead to everything and we're part of it, do you agree? It doesn't have to be the big bang. An etetnal somethingness that evolves and devolves makes more sense than something out of pure nothing.
 
RM5998

RM5998

Sack of Meat
Sep 3, 2018
2,202
There was an eternal something that lead to everything and we're part of it, do you agree? It doesn't have to be the big bang. An etetnal somethingness that evolves and devolves makes more sense than something out of pure nothing.

To be honest, I have difficulty in thinking of myself as anything more than a bag of bones, meat, blood and electricity. I no longer think of my consciousness as anything special. Thus, all ends at the singularity, like physics.
 
D

Deleted member 847

Guest
To be honest, I have difficulty in thinking of myself as anything more than a bag of bones, meat, blood and electricity. I no longer think of my consciousness as anything special.
You're made out of materials that came from that eternal initial point, therefore you are that point. I'm not talking about consciousness. Listen to Alan Watts' videos on youtube. Even if consciousness was eternal and we were made out of spirit, the same logic would apply, just replace the initial point with initial consciousness, but I don't believe that anymore.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
N

ningaman151

Experienced
Jul 28, 2018
234
There was an eternal something that lead to everything and we're part of it, do you agree? It doesn't have to be the big bang. An etetnal somethingness that evolves and devolves makes more sense than something out of pure nothing.
There is no evidence of anything eternal. An assertion made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. What we do know is that big bang occurred 13.7 billion years ago. The big bang was the expansion of space and time, so it is a meaningless question to ask what happened "before" the big bang.
 

Similar threads

Darkover
Replies
12
Views
431
Suicide Discussion
Gustav Hartmann
Gustav Hartmann
Defenestration
Replies
2
Views
140
Suicide Discussion
Defenestration
Defenestration