Suicideisnirvana
Specialist
- Aug 4, 2018
- 312
There is something that should be taken into consideration : No suicide method is perfect. Nembutal is the closest thing there is to a perfect method, yet it's still tastes like crap and not everybody has the money to get it.
If you wanna discard any method that isn't perfect, you'll have to discard every method, and this is just unacceptable for people who are set on dying, who have no qualms about it nor second thoughts and are just looking for a method. We can't compare methods to some ideal, inexistent, unavailable dream method and then discard them because they don't raise to those inexistent/absurd standards, NOT IF WE ARE SET on finding a method.
"Yet but with this method you suffer 2 seconds before dying, i don't recommand it"
"But it tastes awful"
I'm not trying to be disrepectful to anybody, i'm just stating a fact : No method is perfect and in a prohibition society, suicide will always comes with some adversity, all you can do is find the method that minimizes, there is no method with no adversity in a prohibition society. What the people set on dying are looking for is the suicide method that combines : The most lethality + The less suffering and uncomfort. Not an inexistent method with 100% lethality and 0% suffering and uncomfort, since it doesn't exist.
So taken those into considerations, i'd say Nembutal, then guns and then jumping FROM A REALLY HIGH GROUND (where lethality is 99% guaranteed no matter how you land, because you can't control landing on your heads).are the best methods.
Let's take jumping as an example for instance, it won't do to just say "But there is 1% chance of surviving", "but you may suffer for 15 seconds before dying", you'd have to show also some better alternatives. What then ? hanging ? With its HUGE 20+% survival rate and risks of complication ? Electrocution ? What exactly except Nembutal and Guns would you put above jumping ?
If you wanna discard any method that isn't perfect, you'll have to discard every method, and this is just unacceptable for people who are set on dying, who have no qualms about it nor second thoughts and are just looking for a method. We can't compare methods to some ideal, inexistent, unavailable dream method and then discard them because they don't raise to those inexistent/absurd standards, NOT IF WE ARE SET on finding a method.
"Yet but with this method you suffer 2 seconds before dying, i don't recommand it"
"But it tastes awful"
I'm not trying to be disrepectful to anybody, i'm just stating a fact : No method is perfect and in a prohibition society, suicide will always comes with some adversity, all you can do is find the method that minimizes, there is no method with no adversity in a prohibition society. What the people set on dying are looking for is the suicide method that combines : The most lethality + The less suffering and uncomfort. Not an inexistent method with 100% lethality and 0% suffering and uncomfort, since it doesn't exist.
So taken those into considerations, i'd say Nembutal, then guns and then jumping FROM A REALLY HIGH GROUND (where lethality is 99% guaranteed no matter how you land, because you can't control landing on your heads).are the best methods.
Let's take jumping as an example for instance, it won't do to just say "But there is 1% chance of surviving", "but you may suffer for 15 seconds before dying", you'd have to show also some better alternatives. What then ? hanging ? With its HUGE 20+% survival rate and risks of complication ? Electrocution ? What exactly except Nembutal and Guns would you put above jumping ?
Last edited: