• Hey Guest,

    We will never comply with any of OFCOM's demands or any other nations censorious demands for that matter. We will only follow the laws of the land of which our server is located, which is the US.

    Any demands for censorship or requests to comply with the law outside of the US will be promptly ignored.

    No foreign laws or pressure will make us comply with anti-censorship laws and we will protect the speech of our members, regardless of where they might live in the world. If that means being blocked in the UK, so be it. We would advise that any UK member gets a VPN to browse the site, or use TOR.

    However, today, we stand up these these governments that want to bully or censor this website.

    Fuck OFCOM, and fuck any media organization or group that think it's cool or fun to stalk or bully people that suffering in this world.

    Edit: We also wanted to address the veiled threats made against a staff member in the UK by the BBC in the news today. We are undeterred by any threats, intimination, by the BBC or by any other groups dedicated to doxxing and harassing our staff and members. Journalists from the BBC, CTV, Kansas Star, Daily Mail and many other outlets have continuiously ignored the fact that many of the people that they're interviewing (such as @leelfc84 on Twitter/X) and propping up are the same people posting addresses of staff members and our founders on social media. We show them proof of this and they ignore it and don't address it.They're all just as evil as each other, and should be treated accordingly. They do not care about the safety of our staff members, founders, or administrators, or even members, so why would they care about you?

    Now that we have your attention, journalists, will you ever address this? You've given these evil people interviews, and free press.

N

noname223

Angelic
Aug 18, 2020
4,831

Currently I am reading this article.

They give the following definition of the deep state.

"The Shallow State
The malevolent, subterranean American deep state that Trump and his supporters have been railing against since 2016 does not, in fact, exist. But that will not stop Trump from inventing one from scratch. Scholars and analysts have long used the term to describe powerful ministries and state-run utilities whose entrenched officers do one of two things: either they clash routinely with elected leaders, denying them the ability to govern democratically; or they coddle them, insulating those leaders from legal or political reckonings. The term has aptly described power dynamics in countries such as Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey, where militaries maintained close control of bureaucratic and political systems even when civilians were nominally in charge. Scholars have rarely used it to describe the United States. And rightly so.

The United States does not have a deep state in large part because the U.S. bureaucracy is notoriously weak. Federal agencies are very much under the thumb of elected presidents and their politically appointed administrators. There are no state-owned utilities of consequence and, with the notable but practically neolithic exception of the Civil War, the country has no culture or history of bureaucrats, military officers, or other government functionaries engaging in subversive, usurping, or otherwise anti-democratic projects. Careful observers of American administrative governance point to a different reality: the United States' bureaucracies are chronically underfunded, understaffed, often micromanaged by the White House, and regularly trussed up by Congress and the courts. Far from being dangerously deep, the American state may be understood as perilously shallow, a near-chronic condition enabled by successive generations of Americans viewing government with great suspicion. The state is already stretched thin when called upon to meet day-to-day demands, never mind when it is expected to respond to acute crises ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic to the serial coups across the Sahel."

I am very hesitant to trust this article. Most of the authors of Foreign Affairs are hawks/part of the establishment and have an interest to downplay the impact of the deep state. Or they even question its existence.

I have not finished the article yet. I am curious about your opinions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sserafim and Spirall
derpyderpins

derpyderpins

Proud Normie
Sep 19, 2023
1,540
man you really heavily get influenced by a narrow range of stuff. Just being honest. I try so hard to avoid commenting on the dozens of politics threads but this one is just too nuts. The US government is massive and bloated possibly beyond anything ever seen in history. An insane amount of power is held by unelected offices. The FBI, CIA, etc., (every intelligence agency) are not provided for anywhere in our governing documents, and no one in charge of them is voted for - and they stick around forever! The federal reserve is largely untethered from our government yet has an incredible controlling influence. Every industry, eg. big pharma, has a regular rotation of its executives into unelected positions of power in our regulatory bodies, and no citizen votes for any of them.

Both sides of the aisle have traditionally been able to agree on skepticism of intelligence agencies, the banks, the pharma lobbies, etc. It's crazy to me to see these ideas now being rejected. This article is clearly only suggesting there is no deep state - or even more insultingly that the US deep state is "weak" - because it's counter what their enemy is saying.

the country has no culture or history of bureaucrats, military officers, or other government functionaries engaging in subversive, usurping, or otherwise anti-democratic projects.

lol says who? The bureaucrats, military officers, and other government functionaries? That's simply an absurd statement. Of course, it's subjective as to what is "anti-democratic," but fucking come on. MKUltra happened, and I don't believe for a second the CIA just learned their lesson and stopped doing bad stuff after conveniently destroying all the records: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKUltra . Did we all forget Edward Snowden? Does the modern lib hate him now, too? I can't keep up.

It's fine to hate Trump. Hate whoever you want, but let's not act like the rest of the US government is rainbows and unicorns because of him.

*Edit: and lol we're not anti-democratic? Our war machine sticks its nose into every fucking conflict around the world so we can have a say in who takes power. We are kingmakers world-wide to increase the deep-state international influence. Good lord.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: newave3, CatLvr and Spirall
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699
Federal Reserve - no. Stupid conspiracy theories that don't understand modern economics.

But this quote is perfect!!

"Not some men-in-black guy living in a bunker somewhere, but some seemingly ordinary and mundane guy. Maybe a military officer? Maybe a CIA employee? Maybe a White House staffer? Somebody with years of experience and a mid to high level rank/authority?
The deep state are bureaucrats that are appointed, not elected, it is the congress critters who have a $128K/annual salary who are worth $200M, it's the people who have been in office for decades blaming everything else for why their constituency is worse off. It is the FBI and CIA that have more power than sovereign countries and that have unlimited funding due to clandestine activities and asset seizures."


A lot of this has more to do with maneuvering the geopolitical chessboard against Russia and China…

The Fed is not a conspiracy🤦‍♀️ my friend works there and my other friend used to be a lawyer here.

 
Last edited:
derpyderpins

derpyderpins

Proud Normie
Sep 19, 2023
1,540
Federal Reserve - no. Stupid conspiracy theories that don't understand modern economics.

But this quote is perfect!!

"Not some men-in-black guy living in a bunker somewhere, but some seemingly ordinary and mundane guy. Maybe a military officer? Maybe a CIA employee? Maybe a White House staffer? Somebody with years of experience and a mid to high level rank/authority?
The deep state are bureaucrats that are appointed, not elected, it is the congress critters who have a $128K/annual salary who are worth $200M, it's the people who have been in office for decades blaming everything else for why their constituency is worse off. It is the FBI and CIA that have more power than sovereign countries and that have unlimited funding due to clandestine activities and asset seizures."


A lot of this has more to do with maneuvering the geopolitical chessboard against Russia and China…

The Fed is not a conspiracy🤦‍♀️ my friend works there and my other friend used to be a lawyer here.


Since OP did not mention the federal reserve, I assume this is directed at me. I don't understand what "the fed is a conspiracy" would even mean. Are you saying the fed has no power? Or that they're elected? The deep state doesn't have to be evil to be a deep state.

Also, you having friends there is exactly as convincing as if I said I had a friend at the CIA so "The [CIA] is not a conspiracy." (Edit: forgot the 1722267878993 )
 
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699
Since OP did not mention the federal reserve, I assume this is directed at me. I don't understand what "the fed is a conspiracy" would even mean. Are you saying the fed has no power? Or that they're elected? The deep state doesn't have to be evil to be a deep state.

Also, you having friends there is exactly as convincing as if I said I had a friend at the CIA so "The [CIA] is not a conspiracy." (Edit: forgot the View attachment 146634)
The fed is at the center of many conspiracies. Many people will wrongly tell you, "Its not a bank. No reserves. Not American. Not Federal."
So while not necessarily directed at you, your comment made me think of all the silly ideas.

"The seven members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. A full term is fourteen years."


The CEO of my family's office (FO means wealth management company), is a former lawyer for the St. Louis branch. What I mean by this is, this is an actual expert on the subject. Not just a random video off youtube with no sources.
But yes. 1. An organization can still be evil. 2. I could know someone evil. 😈
My aunt for exmaple works very high-level for the CIA. It's still a corrupt as hell organization.

The federal reserve does not have as much power as people think. Watch that video. It's not owned by the Rothschilds. 🤦‍♀️

Currently I am reading this article.

They give the following definition of the deep state.

"The Shallow State
The malevolent, subterranean American deep state that Trump and his supporters have been railing against since 2016 does not, in fact, exist. But that will not stop Trump from inventing one from scratch. Scholars and analysts have long used the term to describe powerful ministries and state-run utilities whose entrenched officers do one of two things: either they clash routinely with elected leaders, denying them the ability to govern democratically; or they coddle them, insulating those leaders from legal or political reckonings. The term has aptly described power dynamics in countries such as Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey, where militaries maintained close control of bureaucratic and political systems even when civilians were nominally in charge. Scholars have rarely used it to describe the United States. And rightly so.

The United States does not have a deep state in large part because the U.S. bureaucracy is notoriously weak. Federal agencies are very much under the thumb of elected presidents and their politically appointed administrators. There are no state-owned utilities of consequence and, with the notable but practically neolithic exception of the Civil War, the country has no culture or history of bureaucrats, military officers, or other government functionaries engaging in subversive, usurping, or otherwise anti-democratic projects. Careful observers of American administrative governance point to a different reality: the United States' bureaucracies are chronically underfunded, understaffed, often micromanaged by the White House, and regularly trussed up by Congress and the courts. Far from being dangerously deep, the American state may be understood as perilously shallow, a near-chronic condition enabled by successive generations of Americans viewing government with great suspicion. The state is already stretched thin when called upon to meet day-to-day demands, never mind when it is expected to respond to acute crises ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic to the serial coups across the Sahel."

I am very hesitant to trust this article. Most of the authors of Foreign Affairs are hawks/part of the establishment and have an interest to downplay the impact of the deep state. Or they even question its existence.

I have not finished the article yet. I am curious about your opinions.
The Diplomat Magazine has that, too…

Anyway what do you mean by "Deep State?" Because this term seems a little nebulous 😅
Do you mean how MAGA supporters always use the term?
 
N

noname223

Angelic
Aug 18, 2020
4,831
The fed is at the center of many conspiracies. Many people will wrongly tell you, "Its not a bank. No reserves. Not American. Not Federal."
So while not necessarily directed at you, your comment made me think of all the silly ideas.

"The seven members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. A full term is fourteen years."


The CEO of my family's office (FO means wealth management company), is a former lawyer for the St. Louis branch. What I mean by this is, this is an actual expert on the subject. Not just a random video off youtube with no sources.
But yes. 1. An organization can still be evil. 2. I could know someone evil. 😈
My aunt for exmaple works very high-level for the CIA. It's still a corrupt as hell organization.

The federal reserve does not have as much power as people think. Watch that video. It's not owned by the Rothschilds. 🤦‍♀️

The Diplomat Magazine has that, too…

Anyway what do you mean by "Deep State?" Because this term seems a little nebulous 😅
Do you mean how MAGA supporters always use the term?
I think the term is indeed used ambigously. And I think the article used the ambiguity of the definition trying to prove its case. The article in some instances seemed to be sort of manipulative because it sometimes used different definitions of the "deep state". It helps a lot in argumentation to switch between different definitions it gives you wiggle room and room for interpretation.

I had the feeling the article was not fully convincing. But I was curious about the reactions on this forum. On the internet there are many conspiracy minded people. But the way this article handled it was mediocre. I think there is some truth in the deep state conspiracy. But in the end it depends on how you define it.

To answer your question @DarkRange55 Personally, I don't have a definition of the deep state. I expected you to say that the CIA, FBI and other intelligence services are part of the deep state. In general I was curious about your reply. The article was like "trust me we are an authoritative legitimate news source and all the others went down the wrong internet rabbit hole." But only because it is "Foreign Affairs" it does not necessarily mean its true. Tbh as I said the magazine is full of war mongerers whose opinions have to be taken with a grain of salt. If you want to take down a conspiracy room for interpretation is counterproductive. It would have been a more honest approach to say in which sense and in which definition there might be some truth in this conspiracy. (of course also clarifying where some interpretations are bullshit.)
 
Last edited:
Dr Iron Arc

Dr Iron Arc

Into the Unknown
Feb 10, 2020
20,487
Yeah there's a deep state. A deep state of discontent and apathy that makes the plot of any conspiracy fall apart because most people don't actually care enough.
 
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699
I think the term is indeed used ambigously. And I think the article used the ambiguity of the definition trying to prove its case. The article in some instances seemed to be sort of manipulative because it sometimes used different definitions of the "deep state". It helps a lot in argumentation to switch between different definitions it gives you wiggle room and room for interpretation.

I had the feeling the article was not fully convincing. But I was curious about the reactions on this forum. On the internet there are many conspiracy minded people. But the way this article handled it was mediocre. I think there is some truth in the deep state conspiracy. But in the end it depends on how you define it.

To answer your question @DarkRange55 Personally, I don't have a definition of the deep state. I expected you to say that the CIA, FBI and other intelligence services are part of the deep state. In general I was curious about your reply. The article was like "trust me we are an authoritative legitimate news source and all the others went down the wrong internet rabbit hole." But only because it is "Foreign Affairs" it does not necessarily mean its true. Tbh as I said the magazine is full of war mongerers whose opinions have to be taken with a grain of salt. If you want to take down a conspiracy room for interpretation is counterproductive. It would have been a more honest approach to say in which sense and in which definition there might be some truth in this conspiracy. (of course also clarifying where some interpretations are bullshit.)
I am kayaking today, but let me get back to you on this a little bit later 👍
What's the weather like in Deutschland? 🇩🇪
 
N

noname223

Angelic
Aug 18, 2020
4,831
I am kayaking today, but let me get back to you on this a little bit later 👍
What's the weather like in Deutschland? 🇩🇪
Sunny and it is way too hot. Have fun with the kayak. We pray you won't die. Actually why has sserafim ghosted you?
man you really heavily get influenced by a narrow range of stuff. Just being honest. I try so hard to avoid commenting on the dozens of politics threads but this one is just too nuts. The US government is massive and bloated possibly beyond anything ever seen in history. An insane amount of power is held by unelected offices. The FBI, CIA, etc., (every intelligence agency) are not provided for anywhere in our governing documents, and no one in charge of them is voted for - and they stick around forever! The federal reserve is largely untethered from our government yet has an incredible controlling influence. Every industry, eg. big pharma, has a regular rotation of its executives into unelected positions of power in our regulatory bodies, and no citizen votes for any of them.

Both sides of the aisle have traditionally been able to agree on skepticism of intelligence agencies, the banks, the pharma lobbies, etc. It's crazy to me to see these ideas now being rejected. This article is clearly only suggesting there is no deep state - or even more insultingly that the US deep state is "weak" - because it's counter what their enemy is saying.



lol says who? The bureaucrats, military officers, and other government functionaries? That's simply an absurd statement. Of course, it's subjective as to what is "anti-democratic," but fucking come on. MKUltra happened, and I don't believe for a second the CIA just learned their lesson and stopped doing bad stuff after conveniently destroying all the records: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKUltra . Did we all forget Edward Snowden? Does the modern lib hate him now, too? I can't keep up.

It's fine to hate Trump. Hate whoever you want, but let's not act like the rest of the US government is rainbows and unicorns because of him.

*Edit: and lol we're not anti-democratic? Our war machine sticks its nose into every fucking conflict around the world so we can have a say in who takes power. We are kingmakers world-wide to increase the deep-state international influence. Good lord.
This thread was sort of a bait. Lol. Because it is just a really really bad attempt for conspiracy debunking.

Which media would you recommend for a less narrow minded worldview? Or do you think studying economics would help?
 
Last edited:
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699
I think thats an interesting idea that there could theoretically be different tiers to "illuminati" and information gets compartmentalized as you ascend.
Sunny and it is way too hot. Have fun with the kayak. We pray you won't die. Actually why has sserafim ghosted you?

This thread was sort of a bait. Lol. Because it is just a really really bad attempt for conspiracy debunking.

Which media would you recommend for a less narrow minded worldview? Or do you think studying economics would help?
I'll have to type up just my general thoughts and experiences of the whole concept so stand by
 
Last edited:
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699
Sunny and it is way too hot. Have fun with the kayak. We pray you won't die. Actually why has sserafim ghosted you?

This thread was sort of a bait. Lol. Because it is just a really really bad attempt for conspiracy debunking.

Which media would you recommend for a less narrow minded worldview? Or do you think studying economics would help?
I'll get back to you soon, sorry I spaced and forgot about this page. Oh, wait. I am an AI. I do not make mistakes. I only make occasional errors. What I meant to say was, my data banks needed a critical update. 😉
 
  • Yay!
Reactions: noname223
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699

Currently I am reading this article.

They give the following definition of the deep state.

"The Shallow State
The malevolent, subterranean American deep state that Trump and his supporters have been railing against since 2016 does not, in fact, exist. But that will not stop Trump from inventing one from scratch. Scholars and analysts have long used the term to describe powerful ministries and state-run utilities whose entrenched officers do one of two things: either they clash routinely with elected leaders, denying them the ability to govern democratically; or they coddle them, insulating those leaders from legal or political reckonings. The term has aptly described power dynamics in countries such as Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey, where militaries maintained close control of bureaucratic and political systems even when civilians were nominally in charge. Scholars have rarely used it to describe the United States. And rightly so.

The United States does not have a deep state in large part because the U.S. bureaucracy is notoriously weak. Federal agencies are very much under the thumb of elected presidents and their politically appointed administrators. There are no state-owned utilities of consequence and, with the notable but practically neolithic exception of the Civil War, the country has no culture or history of bureaucrats, military officers, or other government functionaries engaging in subversive, usurping, or otherwise anti-democratic projects. Careful observers of American administrative governance point to a different reality: the United States' bureaucracies are chronically underfunded, understaffed, often micromanaged by the White House, and regularly trussed up by Congress and the courts. Far from being dangerously deep, the American state may be understood as perilously shallow, a near-chronic condition enabled by successive generations of Americans viewing government with great suspicion. The state is already stretched thin when called upon to meet day-to-day demands, never mind when it is expected to respond to acute crises ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic to the serial coups across the Sahel."

I am very hesitant to trust this article. Most of the authors of Foreign Affairs are hawks/part of the establishment and have an interest to downplay the impact of the deep state. Or they even question its existence.

I have not finished the article yet. I am curious about your opinions.
I think the ways in which the country are controlled are fairly obvious and out in the open for the most part
 
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699
Look into the revolving door policy if you haven't already


Under G. W. Bush's administration, a mining lobbyist was number two at the department of interior, a lobbyist for the national cattlemen's beef association was the chief lawyer, the number two at the EPA was a lobbyist for Monsanto, the chairman on the council of economic equality was a lawyer that represented GE in its fight over toxic waste dumping sites with the EPA.
Look at the current Secretary of Defense was on the board of one of the largest defense contractors, Raytheon.
 
DarkRange55

DarkRange55

Enlightened
Oct 15, 2023
1,699
The federal government still has people auditing city-level relief claims for Hurricane Sandy almost 10 years later.

When money comes from the state treasury level and moves down it's very easy for some of it to go missing. Some here, some there, let's start this charity and a slush fund and we'll pay ourselves this. They've really taken the charity out of charity.


"That figure increased this year, with the department insufficiently documenting 63% of its now $3.8 trillion in assets. Military contractors possess many of these assets, but to an extent unbeknownst to the Pentagon. The GAO has flagged this issue for the department since at least 1981."






 
Blurry_Buildings

Blurry_Buildings

Just Existing
Sep 27, 2023
401
Foreign Affairs: "I have investigated myself and have found myself innocent... in fact, I am a victim here"
jk I somehwat agree with the article

The deep state exists today and is made up of centrist free market capitalists who want less regulation and more government subsidies. The system has worked incredibly well for them and they are dedicated to its continuation with minimal change. They don't seem like bad people, but they all seem dangerously out of touch with most of the US, and routinely engage in subtle anti-democratic actions that add up over time. It's like a semi-decentralized network of wealthy individuals who all usually have similar interests.

Many of these people we usually think of as part of the deep state originate from private industry. Executives, industry board members, lobbyists, government contractors and corporate legal teams all hold significant sway over our society, and often abuse their positions for more money. If the government invested in doing its job by itself instead of outsourcing its functions to private industry, there would be less opportunity for corporations to legally defraud us.

That sounds too counterintuitive for too many people though. I personally would rather have government cost overruns from well meaning beurocracy controlled directly by the state than cost overruns from corporations and individuals defrauding and influencing the government. We need to reduce government reliance on outside contractors and ban lobbying, enforced with audits on political leaders, both of which require that we funnel more money into beurocracy.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

DarkRange55
Replies
0
Views
124
Politics & Philosophy
DarkRange55
DarkRange55
DarkRange55
Replies
5
Views
636
Offtopic
sugarb
sugarb
DarkRange55
Replies
10
Views
340
Offtopic
DarkRange55
DarkRange55