Lostallhope is pro-life and unreliable.
i have to both agree and disagree with you here. the site is pretty clearly pro-choice, run by someone who is in recovery. they state on their home page:
Lost All Hope has no angle. The site is non-profit. It has no religious affiliation. It has no political stand point on the whys and wherefores, pros and cons, of suicide or euthanasia. It offers no advice, and has no bulletin boards, chat or forums (although does link to some). It is here as an impartial resource, to help inform you, and make whatever choice is right for you. I hope you find it of use.
while this person does urge suicidal people to be sure of their decision ("Be sure, be really,
really sure, that there is no other way to get over the pain you are experiencing, other than suicide" and "Follow the three day rule. If you are ready to commit suicide, like really,
really ready, wait three days, or better still a week, until you actually go through with it") and provides various help resources they do seem to understand that some are beyond help. also, someone who is fundamentally pro life wouldn't provide detailed info on methods.
but i do take issue with their "most lethal methods" page; it is from a very limited study looking at a 3 year period in a specific location and then rated by "291 lay persons and 10 forensic pathologists". i guess i'm just not willing to put my trust in a study in which 97% of it's sources are lay persons and that at this point is nearly 25 years old.