D
dyingispeaceful
Member
- Aug 10, 2018
- 66
I do not see this method being looked at from the perspective below and it's very important to look at it this way.
Let's simulate nitrogen asphyxiation with a Max Dogg kit for John Doe.
-John is confident that the cylinder, flow meter, regulator and hose are all perfectly set up.
-John is not very confident in his ability to hyperventilate properly because of the stress of the situation.
-John is not very confident about his ability to breathe deeply once he pulls the exit bag down because of the stress of the situation.
-John awaits impending torture soon. Therefore, he is confident that once he pulls the bag down, nothing psychological can stop him from aborting the process. The bag will indeed be pulled down for the next 25 mins until the tank is depleted.
-John has checked into a hotel and is confident no one would interrupt him for at least 6 hrs.
John attempts it. Luckily, and because of his planning and hard work, the equipment is perfectly set up and there is no sign of any interuption. Unfortunately, he could not hyperventilate properly or deep breathily as he feared.
Questions to consider:
Q1. How would you predict the intensity of physical sensations that will try to stop John from carying on this process. What can he do to overcome them and how easy or hard is it?
Q2. In the case John overcomes these physical sensations and the bag is indeed down for 25 mins until the tank depleted, will John be dead then or just unconscious? If unconscious, will he eventually die or regain conciousness? What might happen after the 6 hour mark when the body is found?
Q3. In the case John regains consciousness, will he damage his brain? If yes, to what extent?
To everyone considering this method, I believe these are the scenerios we should think about. As peaceful and reliable as this method sounds, there are things where this could go wrong. I hope everyone could do proper research before attempting this or any other methods as failed attempts could make things a lot more worse. This might be the last thing we do. Why not dedicate as much of our time and energy into it as possible to avoid failure?
Let's simulate nitrogen asphyxiation with a Max Dogg kit for John Doe.
-John is confident that the cylinder, flow meter, regulator and hose are all perfectly set up.
-John is not very confident in his ability to hyperventilate properly because of the stress of the situation.
-John is not very confident about his ability to breathe deeply once he pulls the exit bag down because of the stress of the situation.
-John awaits impending torture soon. Therefore, he is confident that once he pulls the bag down, nothing psychological can stop him from aborting the process. The bag will indeed be pulled down for the next 25 mins until the tank is depleted.
-John has checked into a hotel and is confident no one would interrupt him for at least 6 hrs.
John attempts it. Luckily, and because of his planning and hard work, the equipment is perfectly set up and there is no sign of any interuption. Unfortunately, he could not hyperventilate properly or deep breathily as he feared.
Questions to consider:
Q1. How would you predict the intensity of physical sensations that will try to stop John from carying on this process. What can he do to overcome them and how easy or hard is it?
Q2. In the case John overcomes these physical sensations and the bag is indeed down for 25 mins until the tank depleted, will John be dead then or just unconscious? If unconscious, will he eventually die or regain conciousness? What might happen after the 6 hour mark when the body is found?
Q3. In the case John regains consciousness, will he damage his brain? If yes, to what extent?
To everyone considering this method, I believe these are the scenerios we should think about. As peaceful and reliable as this method sounds, there are things where this could go wrong. I hope everyone could do proper research before attempting this or any other methods as failed attempts could make things a lot more worse. This might be the last thing we do. Why not dedicate as much of our time and energy into it as possible to avoid failure?