
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,225
So I just had an interesting thought but before I begin I will add a disclaimer just so there isn't any misunderstandings.
Disclaimer: I am not a counselor, therapist, nor mental health professional, nor a doctor. This is just a hypothetical thought that I've had and found interesting to explore for educational and philosophical purposes only. and in no way would I or have any inclination where I would see myself as one especially in the current world and its pro-life State, etc. This is just a thought I had that I found interesting.
With that said, in a hypothetical scenario, this thread is about how I would act if I was a psychotherapist or counselor in our current system while being a pro-choice champion and advocate. Again, this is for exploratory and informational purposes only. To start, here are a brief list of some of the things I would do if I were an mental health professional practicing if I had a client.
1. In the first session when a patient is meeting and introducing themselves, I would definitely set the boundary before proceeding with anything else, which will include the stating the terms and limits of confidentiality (as per dictated by legal and professional standards – a.k.a. the very minimal baseline). This allows a patient to understand the relationship and power dynamics upfront and the patient can decide whether he/she wants to proceed or not.
2. During the practice, while I may do something based on what the profession dictates, I would aim to not just parrot off things or do the things that all/most psychotherapists and mental health professionals do, and put myself in a position that I can actually be "constructively" helpful to the patient. This includes if the patient asks me for direct advice, I would give it while still maintaining the professional standards that the profession requires, which again, within boundaries.
3. If a patient crosses a line into danger to others or oneself (and as required by law in the current system (even if I personally am against it or disagree with it) and professional ethical requirements), I will do whatever I can to not have to break confidentiality or violate bodily autonomy, while still being compliant with the law (to avoid legal liabilities for myself) and professional ethics (to not lose the license or be barred from practice). By this, I would go through every hoop and steps to make sure that the patient isn't going to get me into trouble, nor be quick to rat/snitch/turn the patient in (breaking their trust or confidentiality), UNLESS it is 100% beyond a reasonable doubt. This means unless they explicitly said (and confirmed danger to self, imminent, no safety plan, and even insisted on it – leaving me with absolutely no other choice), then I would act. But merely discussing CTB or planning it (but not imminent) I would work with the patient to understand and empathize, but also gently remind the patient of the legal obligation and give every reasonable chance for the patient to either recant, come with a safety agreement (to protect from liability, legal issues), or ensure that the patient won't just go and CTB, and inform the patient of potential consequences of involuntary commitments and psych holds as well as the consequences. Of course, in a real world scenario there are many other factors and it isn't something really straightforward, granted my simple example is just that, an reductive one.
4. When interacting with the patient, I treat it more as a conversation, with constructive advice (if solicited) while also guiding the patient towards their choices (again while also reminding them of the boundaries) and not spew platitudes and what not. I will aim to be constructive and helpful, trying to be a friend rather than just do the same trite bullshit that most other mental health professionals do. Some may even claim that perhaps I'd be better being a life coach in the scenario versus a mental health professional, but I digress… I just don't want to throw labels or diagnosis, or dismiss, downplay, or even deflect and treat the patient as a me versus them dynamic.
In summary, if I was a psychotherapist or mental health professional (while being pro-choicer myself), I would do whatever I can within the limits of the system to honor the patient's bodily autonomy, dignity, and confidentiality (as well as trust). However, with all mental health professionals, if I was one, sadly, I would be still hard-bound by legal and ethical requirements to act (not because I want to but because I would be required to in very specific situations). Though I will do what I can to avoid being in a situation where I may have to act and go against my personal values. In an ideal system and one that I would always keep fighting and advocating for, of course, I would be 100% support of one that will NEVER breach confidentiality or violate bodily autonomy if the legal and ethical system changes to support that, which sadly isn't coming anytime soon. Anyways, I mainly wrote this thread and article because it was an interesting thought I had and I wanted to highlight and demonstrate what I would do if I was an MHP. What would you do if you were an MHP or someone in charge of patients, would you do the same as well or not?
Disclaimer: I am not a counselor, therapist, nor mental health professional, nor a doctor. This is just a hypothetical thought that I've had and found interesting to explore for educational and philosophical purposes only. and in no way would I or have any inclination where I would see myself as one especially in the current world and its pro-life State, etc. This is just a thought I had that I found interesting.
With that said, in a hypothetical scenario, this thread is about how I would act if I was a psychotherapist or counselor in our current system while being a pro-choice champion and advocate. Again, this is for exploratory and informational purposes only. To start, here are a brief list of some of the things I would do if I were an mental health professional practicing if I had a client.
1. In the first session when a patient is meeting and introducing themselves, I would definitely set the boundary before proceeding with anything else, which will include the stating the terms and limits of confidentiality (as per dictated by legal and professional standards – a.k.a. the very minimal baseline). This allows a patient to understand the relationship and power dynamics upfront and the patient can decide whether he/she wants to proceed or not.
2. During the practice, while I may do something based on what the profession dictates, I would aim to not just parrot off things or do the things that all/most psychotherapists and mental health professionals do, and put myself in a position that I can actually be "constructively" helpful to the patient. This includes if the patient asks me for direct advice, I would give it while still maintaining the professional standards that the profession requires, which again, within boundaries.
3. If a patient crosses a line into danger to others or oneself (and as required by law in the current system (even if I personally am against it or disagree with it) and professional ethical requirements), I will do whatever I can to not have to break confidentiality or violate bodily autonomy, while still being compliant with the law (to avoid legal liabilities for myself) and professional ethics (to not lose the license or be barred from practice). By this, I would go through every hoop and steps to make sure that the patient isn't going to get me into trouble, nor be quick to rat/snitch/turn the patient in (breaking their trust or confidentiality), UNLESS it is 100% beyond a reasonable doubt. This means unless they explicitly said (and confirmed danger to self, imminent, no safety plan, and even insisted on it – leaving me with absolutely no other choice), then I would act. But merely discussing CTB or planning it (but not imminent) I would work with the patient to understand and empathize, but also gently remind the patient of the legal obligation and give every reasonable chance for the patient to either recant, come with a safety agreement (to protect from liability, legal issues), or ensure that the patient won't just go and CTB, and inform the patient of potential consequences of involuntary commitments and psych holds as well as the consequences. Of course, in a real world scenario there are many other factors and it isn't something really straightforward, granted my simple example is just that, an reductive one.
4. When interacting with the patient, I treat it more as a conversation, with constructive advice (if solicited) while also guiding the patient towards their choices (again while also reminding them of the boundaries) and not spew platitudes and what not. I will aim to be constructive and helpful, trying to be a friend rather than just do the same trite bullshit that most other mental health professionals do. Some may even claim that perhaps I'd be better being a life coach in the scenario versus a mental health professional, but I digress… I just don't want to throw labels or diagnosis, or dismiss, downplay, or even deflect and treat the patient as a me versus them dynamic.
In summary, if I was a psychotherapist or mental health professional (while being pro-choicer myself), I would do whatever I can within the limits of the system to honor the patient's bodily autonomy, dignity, and confidentiality (as well as trust). However, with all mental health professionals, if I was one, sadly, I would be still hard-bound by legal and ethical requirements to act (not because I want to but because I would be required to in very specific situations). Though I will do what I can to avoid being in a situation where I may have to act and go against my personal values. In an ideal system and one that I would always keep fighting and advocating for, of course, I would be 100% support of one that will NEVER breach confidentiality or violate bodily autonomy if the legal and ethical system changes to support that, which sadly isn't coming anytime soon. Anyways, I mainly wrote this thread and article because it was an interesting thought I had and I wanted to highlight and demonstrate what I would do if I was an MHP. What would you do if you were an MHP or someone in charge of patients, would you do the same as well or not?