TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,355
In previous threads (especially this one), I have talked about having an experiment to disprove pro-lifers' claim of life is always good, always worth living, etc., however, it all seemed to have flaws that I did not forsee (until others have mentioned and/or pointed out). Therefore, I'm making this thread more as a general outline of what I believe should happen or at least some idea of an experiment, test, or simulation that would convince pro-lifers that life isn't always good, it isn't always worth living, and/or that voluntary euthanasia and death with dignity is a valid potion.
With that said, here is my general idea (Note: Keep in mind I'm not perfect and there probably will never be a perfect experiment, simulation, or test-- at least not without it running afoul of ethics and moral violations. But it is at least worth exploring imho). For starters, we will presume that pro-lifers lack the experience and introspection needed to understand and comprehend what "suffering" really entails, therefore, one would need to simulate a similar scenario, or situation so they understand what it is. Next, we must make it realistic yet still within the bounds of ethics, morality, and legality (no everlasting harm or real harm-- this does not include hurt feelings). Finally, it should have some placebo as well to ensure that the experiment is consistent and not just by random chance.
What are your thoughts on my idea(s)? Does anyone have any remarks, suggestions, or perhaps even things that I may have never thought about perhaps? I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.
With that said, here is my general idea (Note: Keep in mind I'm not perfect and there probably will never be a perfect experiment, simulation, or test-- at least not without it running afoul of ethics and moral violations. But it is at least worth exploring imho). For starters, we will presume that pro-lifers lack the experience and introspection needed to understand and comprehend what "suffering" really entails, therefore, one would need to simulate a similar scenario, or situation so they understand what it is. Next, we must make it realistic yet still within the bounds of ethics, morality, and legality (no everlasting harm or real harm-- this does not include hurt feelings). Finally, it should have some placebo as well to ensure that the experiment is consistent and not just by random chance.
What are your thoughts on my idea(s)? Does anyone have any remarks, suggestions, or perhaps even things that I may have never thought about perhaps? I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.