I feel most humans fall in three categories:
Bad humans. They do bad things.
Humans who don't do bad things themselves, but they also won't do good things. Like a person who'd never bully, but also wouldn't want to stop the bully from bullying or offer help to the victim. People who admit being scared of intervening are okay and excluded (e.g. autists, or social anxiety sufferers, or people who have been bullied themselves etc.), but people who won't do anything even when they are physically and mentally able to belong to this group. You could also call these people "enablers".
Good humans who want to help but have little to no power.
Like when I was bullied in school. Boys bullied me (they were in the bad group). Girls ignored it all. They were in the "neutral people group". There were good people who wanted to help me, who defended me and wanted to beat the bullies and comfort me. Guess what? They were my Internet friends who lived elsewhere.
So how am I supposed to view people when I'm constantly in the cycle of "Person A does bad things to me. Person B turns a blind eye. Person C wants to help me but she/he lives in Puerto Rico". Ehh, ehh? Should I just hate Finnish people and love everyone else?
So I struggle a lot between the "Fuck humans, they deserve nothing" and "There are good people out there" opinions.
(I also hate those people who are kind and helpful and good to me, but then after they change their job/get fired/move to another city etc., they forget all about me as if I never existed, even if we had known each other for 5 years and got along really well. It's no wonder Finns are lonely when refuse to meet anyone outside work... unless it's to have sex with their boss to get promotions or date the new intern. But genuine friendships based on our matching personalities? Noooo....) '>->