TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,686
Today is yet another sore reminder of the incongruity of humanity as a whole, especially when it comes to death. The incongruity, specifically, lies in the fact that humans would do things that either result in death (both figuratively and literally, or one or the other), yet would deny the an individual to reach the same state (the state of death, nonexistence). This greatly fuels my misanthropy (ragefuel) towards humanity as a whole as well as my suicidality (suifuel).
Anyways, I have once again, experienced a shitty part of humanity and this is just another push towards my suicidality, increased suicidal ideation. Basically I had liked some person's posts on FB and while this person doesn't really know me, without warning a day later, I was gone, cut out of that person's life and never able to interact with said person anymore. Now the fact that I get blocked, deleted, ignored on social media isn't the main issue here. I am more disgusted at the broader, bigger picture, which is the incongruity of humanity itself. To put it in simplified terms, basically getting deleted, blocked, ignored on social media means that said person is (for all intents and purposes) dead to the person deleting, blocking, and ignoring said person, because of course the target (deleted, blocked, ignored) person cannot ever interact with the person who blocked him/her anymore. Thus, essentially dead. However, I willing to bet that if said person knew I wanted to CTB, he/she would do the opposite, intervene, and force me to live a life I don't want to live, plus additional consequences. This is the hypocrisy and incongruity that I am referring to when discussing about the right to die and how people are okay with killing off said person (indirectly) but if same said person tries to (directly) CTB, then the same people will stop and prevent said person from successfully executing his/her attempt.
Here is a simplified equation to illustrate what I mean.
Let B = blocked, ignored, deleted, D = death, dead, deceased, and CTB = means self-deliverance.
So we can consider that D = B since a person who is blocked, ignored, deleted can no longer interact with the blocker, ignorer, or deleter, thus from the blocker's point of view, the target is essentially dead (since he/she cannot interact anymore, cut out of the blocker's life.
D = CTB is self-explanatory because by self deliverance, assuming one is successful, then one is both literally and figuratively dead, therefore, resulting in 'D'.
Ergo, B = D = CTB, as both actions result in death.
But the irony and incongruity comes from the fact that even though both result in death, one of the options (self-deliverance) will result in intervention from others, thus preventing one from successfully reaching peace and being kept alive, forced to live.
I have various threads elaborating and explaining this incongruity along with examples, so I will just list those threads for reference:
Misanthropy fuel (which shows an example of the incongruity of humans)
People are against suicide because it makes them uncomfortable
Other threads for reference (not directly related but loosely applied):
Stories of my social ineptness, Aspergers, and mistreatment by others
Problems with conversing with others
Suifuel story demonstrating my social failures
In Conclusion:
So yeah, if anything, in the thread about how people are against suicide because it makes them uncomfortable, and misanthropy fuel, the main point that I'm driving home is the fact that they are fine with cutting someone out of their life and all contact with them, but on the same token, if they have knowledge that same said person is suicidal, they will do everything to intervene and prevent the person from CTB'ing. It's incongruous because on one hand, they are essentially figuratively killing them and perfectly fine with it, but when it comes to the person exercising his/her own self-deliverance, they turn around and prevent it from happening. It's basically a fine example of hypocrisy at it's core. Death and no death (or only death when we decide it's time).
Anyways, I have once again, experienced a shitty part of humanity and this is just another push towards my suicidality, increased suicidal ideation. Basically I had liked some person's posts on FB and while this person doesn't really know me, without warning a day later, I was gone, cut out of that person's life and never able to interact with said person anymore. Now the fact that I get blocked, deleted, ignored on social media isn't the main issue here. I am more disgusted at the broader, bigger picture, which is the incongruity of humanity itself. To put it in simplified terms, basically getting deleted, blocked, ignored on social media means that said person is (for all intents and purposes) dead to the person deleting, blocking, and ignoring said person, because of course the target (deleted, blocked, ignored) person cannot ever interact with the person who blocked him/her anymore. Thus, essentially dead. However, I willing to bet that if said person knew I wanted to CTB, he/she would do the opposite, intervene, and force me to live a life I don't want to live, plus additional consequences. This is the hypocrisy and incongruity that I am referring to when discussing about the right to die and how people are okay with killing off said person (indirectly) but if same said person tries to (directly) CTB, then the same people will stop and prevent said person from successfully executing his/her attempt.
Here is a simplified equation to illustrate what I mean.
Let B = blocked, ignored, deleted, D = death, dead, deceased, and CTB = means self-deliverance.
So we can consider that D = B since a person who is blocked, ignored, deleted can no longer interact with the blocker, ignorer, or deleter, thus from the blocker's point of view, the target is essentially dead (since he/she cannot interact anymore, cut out of the blocker's life.
D = CTB is self-explanatory because by self deliverance, assuming one is successful, then one is both literally and figuratively dead, therefore, resulting in 'D'.
Ergo, B = D = CTB, as both actions result in death.
But the irony and incongruity comes from the fact that even though both result in death, one of the options (self-deliverance) will result in intervention from others, thus preventing one from successfully reaching peace and being kept alive, forced to live.
I have various threads elaborating and explaining this incongruity along with examples, so I will just list those threads for reference:
Misanthropy fuel (which shows an example of the incongruity of humans)
People are against suicide because it makes them uncomfortable
Other threads for reference (not directly related but loosely applied):
Stories of my social ineptness, Aspergers, and mistreatment by others
Problems with conversing with others
Suifuel story demonstrating my social failures
In Conclusion:
So yeah, if anything, in the thread about how people are against suicide because it makes them uncomfortable, and misanthropy fuel, the main point that I'm driving home is the fact that they are fine with cutting someone out of their life and all contact with them, but on the same token, if they have knowledge that same said person is suicidal, they will do everything to intervene and prevent the person from CTB'ing. It's incongruous because on one hand, they are essentially figuratively killing them and perfectly fine with it, but when it comes to the person exercising his/her own self-deliverance, they turn around and prevent it from happening. It's basically a fine example of hypocrisy at it's core. Death and no death (or only death when we decide it's time).
Last edited: