ABadPerson
something's off
- Oct 24, 2025
- 15
To 'exist' is defined as being in a state of objective reality, as in something that exists independent of external perception; however, the human consciousness doesn't fit this description of existence as it is influenced and shaped by perception, so how would one define their own existence/lackof?
We perceive reality through it, or rather 'us', yet it only is 'proven' in relation to the world as an ongoing act of interpretation; a phenomenon rather than something that is objectively real in its own right.
Could one say the human mind doesn't exist in any concrete capacity, as it only experiences rather than having its own objectivity? Or, I guess it would be better to say semi-existence; a false illusion that falsifies itself into reality through external factors altered by our bodies, reflecting 'existence' instead of 'existing' in any real sense of the term.
Every single thought and belief is built on neural activity and external feedback that creates a stable illusion of 'I', our consciousness cannot continue on without these reinforcements without complete collapse.
Ironically, the act of pretending it is coherent and stable is what leads to it being able to manifest into semi-existence in the first place, fictionalising its own reality through rewritten realities like memories and values. The body dreams of self, the self 'perceives' reality and builds it therefore 'I' believes the 'self' must exist in this reality.
We believe we exist, so we must do exist; how absurd.
Edit: Wrote this as I was having a mental breakdown helped a bit with the depressive spiral, less of a rant and more of an attempt to define what 'I' am. I wasn't really sure if I should post it here or move it to Offtopic but I felt it was more appropriate to stay here.
We perceive reality through it, or rather 'us', yet it only is 'proven' in relation to the world as an ongoing act of interpretation; a phenomenon rather than something that is objectively real in its own right.
Could one say the human mind doesn't exist in any concrete capacity, as it only experiences rather than having its own objectivity? Or, I guess it would be better to say semi-existence; a false illusion that falsifies itself into reality through external factors altered by our bodies, reflecting 'existence' instead of 'existing' in any real sense of the term.
Every single thought and belief is built on neural activity and external feedback that creates a stable illusion of 'I', our consciousness cannot continue on without these reinforcements without complete collapse.
Ironically, the act of pretending it is coherent and stable is what leads to it being able to manifest into semi-existence in the first place, fictionalising its own reality through rewritten realities like memories and values. The body dreams of self, the self 'perceives' reality and builds it therefore 'I' believes the 'self' must exist in this reality.
We believe we exist, so we must do exist; how absurd.
Edit: Wrote this as I was having a mental breakdown helped a bit with the depressive spiral, less of a rant and more of an attempt to define what 'I' am. I wasn't really sure if I should post it here or move it to Offtopic but I felt it was more appropriate to stay here.