Labyrinth
There is no escaping the burden of existence
- Jan 8, 2024
- 165
If this site is closed we will have no other place to express ourselves. It provides the rare occasion when strangers come together to alleviate common suffering. The only social network where there is no superfluousness, and everyone can be honest without receiving prejudgments. The demand for this site is a symptom of a dystopian society.
Knowledge must be shared no matter what it is. Suppressing information will not prevent suicidal incidents from happening. It must be accepted that the right to self-determination is inalienable. As long as someone is aware of their choice, and carries out a psychometric examination, no one can restrict their freedom. Prohibiting suicide is philosophically unethical.
I admit, not everything is perfect, and I agree that some things can improve. I will give some counterarguments: there is a certain apologetics that preponderates death as the primary solution; the vast majority of assumptions are imbued with a nilist bias; the recovery sector should be more preferential; the selection criteria for new users should be more permissive.
Under the pretext of protecting the vulnerable, political demagogues use moralism and sensationalism to justify censorship. They do not take advantage of the opportunity to connect those who want to die with those who want to help, as their interest is not in "saving lives" as they claim.
I am grateful to the forum for learning the linguistic and conceptual means for my self-discovery. Certainly after coming here I became someone different. The users' life stories exemplify my own pain, and reading them is like therapeutic eye drops in my eyes. (I'm not alone!)
Knowledge must be shared no matter what it is. Suppressing information will not prevent suicidal incidents from happening. It must be accepted that the right to self-determination is inalienable. As long as someone is aware of their choice, and carries out a psychometric examination, no one can restrict their freedom. Prohibiting suicide is philosophically unethical.
I admit, not everything is perfect, and I agree that some things can improve. I will give some counterarguments: there is a certain apologetics that preponderates death as the primary solution; the vast majority of assumptions are imbued with a nilist bias; the recovery sector should be more preferential; the selection criteria for new users should be more permissive.
Under the pretext of protecting the vulnerable, political demagogues use moralism and sensationalism to justify censorship. They do not take advantage of the opportunity to connect those who want to die with those who want to help, as their interest is not in "saving lives" as they claim.
I am grateful to the forum for learning the linguistic and conceptual means for my self-discovery. Certainly after coming here I became someone different. The users' life stories exemplify my own pain, and reading them is like therapeutic eye drops in my eyes. (I'm not alone!)
"
