Peter Breggin's views are contradicted by the mainstream medical community and do not reflect the consensus of the vast majority of psychiatric professionals. He has been criticized for cherry-picking research, misinterpreting data, and spreading misinformation about ECT. As a result, all of his attacks are considered
"a carefully and cleverly crafted piece of artful propaganda." In fact, he has been
repeatedly debunked by the scientific community.
I really hope to hear less of quackery being streamlined as mainstream science. A lot of people here seek psychiatric help, and they can find the help they need in ECT, since it is highly effective for
treatment-resistant depression, acute mania, psychotic mood disorders, and catatonia. By "highly effective," I mean as much as
4 out of every 5 patients. Eventually, whatever decision the user of this site makes is up to them. (That includes me.) However, shouldn't decisions be made on accurate information!?