R
ron_g
Experienced
- Nov 25, 2018
- 240
I found this article interesting to read.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/h...l/news-story/598d659e804e19417a124fa5726bb626
I would counter his points as follows.
Even if there was physician assisted suicide, there would still be survival instinct.
It is possible and perhaps likely that old people would feel pressured to perceive themselves as a burden and ask for euthanasia on these grounds. However, if euthanasia is illegal, old or disabled people may still suffer for many years from their belief that they might be a burden. So the perception of being a burden may be harmful either way.
Not only are there financial interests in "weak" people's death, but there are likewise financial interests in keeping them alive.
As a sidenote, if euthanasia is logical, what does that mean for the requirement of a person's rationality to decide about their death?
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/h...l/news-story/598d659e804e19417a124fa5726bb626
I would counter his points as follows.
Even if there was physician assisted suicide, there would still be survival instinct.
It is possible and perhaps likely that old people would feel pressured to perceive themselves as a burden and ask for euthanasia on these grounds. However, if euthanasia is illegal, old or disabled people may still suffer for many years from their belief that they might be a burden. So the perception of being a burden may be harmful either way.
Not only are there financial interests in "weak" people's death, but there are likewise financial interests in keeping them alive.
As a sidenote, if euthanasia is logical, what does that mean for the requirement of a person's rationality to decide about their death?